Skip to content
Review Open access

“But it sounded confident”: the role of accuracy, tone, and disclaimers in users' medical decision-making

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · Vol 9 · 0 citations · 36 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Accuracy emerged as the strongest predictor of user trust, although participants did not consistently identify inaccurate advice, and Conversational tone appears to have limited influence, while disclaimers may not consistently promote appropriate caution.

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots are increasingly used in healthcare for applications ranging from symptom triage to lifestyle guidance. Their effectiveness depends not only on their ability to provide reliable information but also on users engaging with their advice while remaining aware of potential inaccuracies. This study investigated how users perceive AI-generated medical advice, with a particular focus on the roles of accuracy, conversational tone, and disclaimers. Methods A survey was conducted with 115 participants who evaluated 15 chatbot scenarios representing five common health problems. Participants assessed chatbot responses varying in accuracy, tone, and the presence of disclaimers. Associations between these factors, user trust, willingness to seek second opinions, and participant characteristics (including age, health literacy, and prior chatbot use) were examined. Results Accuracy emerged as the strongest predictor of user trust, although participants did not consistently identify inaccurate advice. Individual characteristics, including age, health literacy, and prior chatbot experience, showed no significant associations with trust. Differences in chatbot tone had little influence on user perceptions, with chatbots generally being viewed as confident regardless of phrasing. The effects of disclaimers on willingness to seek second opinions were mixed and varied across scenarios, suggesting that disclaimers alone may not effectively prevent over-reliance on chatbot advice. Open-ended responses highlighted trust in healthcare professionals and the importance of clearly communicating AI limitations. Discussion This exploratory study, based on self-reported intentions in hypothetical scenarios, suggests that the accuracy of AI-generated medical advice is the primary determinant of user trust. Conversational tone appears to have limited influence, while disclaimers may not consistently promote appropriate caution. These findings indicate that healthcare chatbots should prioritize accuracy, clearly communicate their limitations, and encourage critical evaluation to achieve an appropriate balance between user trust and scepticism.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

When AI Sounds More Helpful: Users’ Perceptions of AI-Generated and Physician-Provided Health Information

It is suggested that LLM-based chatbots may be perceived as useful supplemental information tools within future Internet health ecosystems, but their deployment should include safeguards that support transparency, verification, and appropriate reliance.

Tian Wang, Masooda N. Bashir · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

User evaluation of AI- and human-generated responses in digital health communication: a paired survey study

The findings suggest that participants perceived the AI-generated response as aligning more closely with central user expectations for text-based health information, particularly regarding clarity and supportive language, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the substantial differences in leng...

C. Schulz, Patrycja Adämmer, Emma Fechner et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

How appropriate are ChatGPT-5’s answers to acne questions?

Online conversational tools have become increasingly common sources of health information, with many patients seeking acne advice through such platforms. Although they may enhance awareness and encourage early consultation, their medical reliability remains uncertain. Because acne is one of the most frequently searched...

Nazlı Caf, Defne Özkoca, Tuğba Kevser Üstünbaş Uzunçakmak et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Validation of an AI-powered mobile application for personalizing medical note explanations: a mixed-methods evaluation

This mixed-methods evaluation suggests that a deliberately constrained, language-focused AI system can improve the accessibility of medical notes while preserving clinical accuracy and safety while extending into clinical interpretation.

Nicholas Lamb · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Me, my doctor and AI: a qualitative interview study on patients’ requirements for trustworthy use of AI-CDSS in ophthalmology

Abstract Objective Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly entering care and redefining how medical decisions are made. As patients are directly affected by hybrid physician-AI decisions without interacting with the system itself, trust, transparency and involvement in...

Insa Schaffernak, Julia Cecil, Anjesa Mahmuti et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

AI Tools for Emotional Support: An Initial Survey of Age-Related Differences in Perceptions and Use

It is suggested that AI’s non-human nature can both reduce stigma and increase concerns about trust and authenticity, and human-centered systems should provide age-appropriate safety guardrails, transparent limitations, privacy protections, and clear pathways to human support.

Jing-Jie Wang, Theresa Nguyen, John Marion et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.