Jul 2026· Journal of King Saud University: Science· Vol 38, pp. 19302025· 0 citations· 27 references
Abstract
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the sub-equation neural network method (SENNM) and the neural network predictions method (NNPM) for solving nonlinear systems commonly encountered in fluid dynamics and nuclear physics. The comparison focuses on accuracy, convergence behavior, training performance, and the preservation of key physical properties. The SENNM integrates analytical sub-equation structures with neural network learning to efficiently capture localized waveforms and soliton-like behaviors. In contrast, the NNPM employs a fully data-driven or physics-informed neural architecture to approximate global solutions without relying on predefined functional assumptions. Both methods are implemented on representative nonlinear differential systems and evaluated using numerical simulations, training-loss analysis, and prediction-performance metrics. Numerical results demonstrate that SENNM achieves higher accuracy in modeling systems with strong nonlinear interactions and supports stable learning dynamics. NNPM exhibits superior robustness and generalization across varying boundary and initial conditions. A detailed comparison of neural network predictions and training losses shows that SENNM converges faster with lower residual error for localized structures, while NNPM maintains consistent prediction quality across the full domain. Figures depicting neural network predictions and training-loss curves further illustrate the relative performance, highlighting SENNM’s sharper solution reconstruction and NNPM’s smoother global approximation behavior. The findings reveal that SENNM and NNPM provide complementary advantages for solving nonlinear physical systems. SENNM excels in accuracy and convergence for highly nonlinear or localized patterns, whereas NNPM offers broader predictive stability and adaptability. Together, these insights support the advancement of hybrid analytical–neural and prediction-based neural frameworks for modeling complex fluid and nuclear physics phenomena.
In this study the conclusion is drawn that a neural network should not be used to replace traditional methods, but should be implemented alongside, to complement.
Oday Hatem Jalel· International journal of res...· 0 citations
A novel combination of symbolic computation and data-driven modeling is introduced to strengthen the theoretical analysis and improve the simulation capabilities of the modified Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation.
Beenish, G. H. Tipu, Maria Samreen et al.· Mathematical and Computation...· 0 citations
This study provides the first application of a PINN-based framework to cubic nonlinear shear-wave propagation in soft solids and out performs the baseline PINNs while requiring no simulation or experimental data for training.
V. Pratap, B. Tripathi· Engineering computations· 0 citations
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) aim to incorporate the phenomenology of the process into their training through an additional mathematical model based on conservation principles (physical laws). This work presents a method for training feedforward neural networks with physics-informed constraints related to st...
Ghabriel A. Gomes de Sá, C. Fontes, M. Embiruçu· Neural computing & applicati...· 0 citations
Numerical results show that the improved PINN method can accurately capture time evolution of the distribution function and electric field, which are consistent with theoretical analysis and conventional numerical codes.
Yuan Fang, Feng Wang, Q. Luan et al.· Plasma Physics and Controlle...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.