Skip to content
Preprint

Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 70 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work formalizes inference-time fairness alignment as a policy shaping problem and proposes a multiplicative policy shaping framework that adjusts action probabilities using action-dependent welfare scores, thus requiring no modification to the base policy.

Abstract

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents achieve strong performance by optimizing scalar reward functions. However, once deployed, the policies of these RL agents are often rigid and costly to adapt to new performance criteria. For instance, an agent trained to maximize expected cumulative reward may not accommodate previously unknown stakeholder preferences. Existing approaches to achieve fairness, a type of preference, in RL typically assume that such preferences are known a priori and require complete retraining of the policy under a fairness-oriented metric. Inspired by inference-time alignment in large language models, we investigate the problem of steering a pretrained RL policy toward welfare-based fairness objectives at inference time without updating the base policy's parameters. We formalize inference-time fairness alignment as a policy shaping problem and propose a multiplicative policy shaping framework that adjusts action probabilities using action-dependent welfare scores, thus requiring no modification to the base policy. Our framework is general and compatible with any deep RL agent. Through extensive experiments across multiple domains, we demonstrate that inference-time policy shaping substantially improves welfare-based fairness objectives while preserving core task performance.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement in Offline Reinforcement Learning

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) must reconcile two competing requirements: policy updates should stay near dataset-supported actions to keep value estimates reliable, yet meaningful gains often require moving beyond the behavior distribution. We develop a geometric view of offline actor updates by modeling policies...

Soohyun Choi, Seonvin Cho, Songnam Hong · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

IB-RL: Isolated Bilateral Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Dialogue Agents

Isolated Bilateral Reinforcement Learning (IB-RL), in which the two roles coevolve through joint rollouts while each role optimizes its own reward through fully independent advantages, action masks, and update paths, produces policies that generalize more effectively to unseen counterparts.

Senhao Wang, Chenghao Cai, Hai-Tao Hu et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

ASP-Based Probabilistic Policy Fixing for Norm Compliant RL

A probabilistic policy fixing framework that adapts norm-agnostic policies online and provides guarantees that fixed policies are near optimal, given a specified level of confidence is presented.

Sebastian P. Adam, Thomas Eiter · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Latent MeanFlow Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning.

LaMPO is proposed, a generative policy framework that formulates offline RL as latent generative policy optimization as well as a behavior-conditioned latent distribution, which provides an informative prior and reduces the modeling burden of the generative process.

Tenglong Liu, Xin Xu, Yixing Lan et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

InfRL: Inference-time Reinforcement Learning for Research Idea Optimization

InfRL (Inference-time Reinforcement Learning) offers a practical and domain-agnostic approach to harness reinforcement learning during inference, bridging the gap between static prompting and computationally intensive parameter-level fine-tuning.

Sikun Guo, Amir Hassan Shariatmadari, Jiuqi Wang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Meta-Learned Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

MeRLa (Meta-Learned Reward Shaping), a principled framework that meta-learns a task-aware shaping function across auxiliary tasks before RLHF training, is introduced, providing theoretical guarantees for policy invariance, analyze representation drift sensitivity, and formally address incentive misalignment from entrop...

Yu-An Chu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.