Skip to content
Open access

Reflection on the responsibilities of data-intensive research organizations in an AI-driven world – A panel discussion

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Population Data Science · Vol 11 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

This moderated panel will explore how data-intensive research organizations can balance innovation with stewardship and suggest recommendations that help data-intensive organizations reimagine their responsibilities not only as the producers of knowledge but as institutions whose everyday operations shape a sustainable and ethical future.

Abstract

The exponential adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), worsening climate disruptions, and new One Health approaches to global health policy, prompt research organizations to re-examine their responsibilities. AI offers powerful capabilities from precision medicine to ecosystem monitoring. Yet its deployment raises concerns related to high energy and water demands, hardware that depends on scarce resources, data governance, ethics and equity. There is further risk that technological solutions may distract from essential ecological and social action. A One Health lens, recognizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, encourages organizations to examine whether their AI tools and infrastructures truly support healthy ecosystems and communities. This raises critical questions: How should organizations balance scientific urgency with the responsibility to protect people, places, and data? How can meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration be structured? How can institutions uphold accountability to land, water, Indigenous communities, and future generations when deploying AI? Operational issues are central to this conversation. This moderated panel will explore how data-intensive research organizations can balance innovation with stewardship. Discussion topics include: What constitutes climate-resilient and environmentally responsible research infrastructure? What is the purpose of calculating organizational carbon footprints, and how can institutions meaningfully measure and manage the carbon and material impacts of AI? How can research cultures encourage the use of energy-efficient models, sustainable computational practices, and responsible procurement? Input from this panel will inform recommendations that help data-intensive organizations reimagine their responsibilities not only as the producers of knowledge but as institutions whose everyday operations shape a sustainable and ethical future.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

A critical perspective and integrative PRISM framework on artificial intelligence and the future of public health

The article proposes the PRISM Framework – a comprehensive, five-dimensional, evidence-grounded model comprising Participatory Design and Community Engagement, Responsible and Regulatory Governance Infrastructure, Inclusive and Equitable Representation, Scientific Rigour and Scalable Infrastructure, and Monitoring, Eva...

Dev Roychowdhury · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Sustainable artificial intelligence in global health: balancing promise, equity, and environmental realities in low- and middle-income countries

Funders and implementers should prioritize durable infrastructure, strengthened health information systems, rigorous evidence generation, environmentally responsible deployment, and local stewardship to achieve scalable, equitable, and sustainable AI in global health.

Yuri Quintana, Titus Schleyer, Arriel Benis et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A GOVERNANCE INFRASTRUCTURE: RETHINKING HEALTH SYSTEMS IN AFRICA

Key applications in diagnostics, disease surveillance, supply chain management, and telemedicine are examined, highlighting how AI improves decision-making, resource allocation, and access to care and the findings suggest that the transformative potential of AI depends on strong governance frameworks, institutional cap...

David Mhlanga · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Data Ethics and Responsible AI Use: A Scoping Review of Governance Principles, Implementation Challenges and Future Directions

The evidence shows strong convergence around fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, human oversight, safety and inclusiveness, but weaker agreement on implementation, and an integrated framework for developing, deploying and monitoring AI systems in ways that are lawful, transparent, accountable, inclusive an...

Sunday Olusola Ladipo, Ifaka Queen Inazu · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

From AI Alerts to Accountable Decisions: A Governance Framework for Regulatory Compliance

The STAGE framework is proposed as a practical approach to maintaining human judgment and organizational accountability when integrating AI into regulatory compliance and focuses on whether organizations can use AI to identify risks while keeping qualified people responsible for interpreting alerts, making decisions, d...

Monisade Oluwagbemigun · 0 citations

Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: Mitigating Risks and Advancing Health Equity.

This work examines current AI applications in public health through the lens of established ethical principles, with particular attention to historically marginalized communities, and proposes concrete strategies, including mandatory equity impact assessments, validation in the communities of intended use, and sustaine...

T. Adirim, Amy Molten · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.