This framework identifies which law each loss in the literature actually optimizes, recovering MDM, UDM, SEDD, and GIDD as special cases; explains why denoiser and cavity coincide for masked diffusion but not for uniform diffusion; proves that a denoiser parameterization makes the uniform ELBO diverge at initialization while the bridge plug-in stays finite; and calibrates ELBO implementations exactly at initialization.
Abstract
What does a discrete diffusion model learn: a denoiser, a score ratio, or a bridge plug-in predictor? At the level of jump rates, these are one object in different coordinates, and reading a neural network in the wrong coordinate changes the process being trained and sampled. Starting with a rigorous derivation of the continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) ELBO for any noising process, boundary terms included, we prove the \emph{Oracle Distance} theorem: the negative ELBO is exactly equal to the data entropy plus the path KL from the oracle reverse process to the learned one, not merely a bound. Its unique optimizer is therefore the conditional expectation of the true reverse jump rate given the current noisy state, and its irreducible cost is the rate at which the forward process $Z_t$ destroys information about the clean data $Z_0$, $-\tfrac{d}{dt}I(Z_0; Z_t)$, so every noising process shares the same best achievable negative ELBO: the data entropy. For sequences with token-factorizing noise, the oracle projection yields three exact coordinates for the optimizer: denoiser, cavity (bridge plug-in), and score, with closed-form conversions among them. This framework identifies which law each loss in the literature actually optimizes, recovering MDM, UDM, SEDD, and GIDD as special cases; explains why denoiser and cavity coincide for masked diffusion but not for uniform diffusion; proves that a denoiser parameterization makes the uniform ELBO diverge at initialization while the bridge plug-in stays finite; and calibrates ELBO implementations exactly at initialization. Every identity is verified numerically, without approximation, on an exactly solvable model.
One implicit DDIM inversion step is the cheapest probe of whether a pretrained diffusion model encodes local manifold geometry at the Bayes limit, strongly convex at the Bayes limit.
This analysis transfers reverse-time discretization errors to the forward corruption law and treats two numerical schemes within a common framework, which identifies a local error, accumulates it through the forward evolution, and inserts the result into a common KL decomposition.
Diffusion models are widely used as priors for linear inverse problems, yet endpoint quality does not reveal when measurement information enters reverse denoising or how it is allocated across signal directions. We study this process through the smoothed likelihood force, the difference between exact posterior and prio...
This work considers a first-order sampler based on the leave-one-out denoiser for uniform and remasking processes whose coordinate updates can be performed in parallel, and derives an exact information-theoretic representation of the discretization error in terms of the mutual information between different coordinates...
Stochastic learning objectives are typically written as expectations over abstract random variables. Actual training, however, uses concrete random inputs that enter both the realized loss and its gradient. Structure in these inputs that is accessible to the learning system can therefore be learned and exploited. Much...
In this paper, we study the extension of Neural Jump ODEs to infinite-dimensional function spaces. In particular, the underlying process $X$ now takes values in $L^2(\Xi, \mathbb{R}^{d_X})$ instead of $\mathbb{R}^{d_X}$ and the Operator NJ-ODE approximates the optimal predictor of this process by producing a representa...
F. Krach, Oliver Löthgren, Josef Teichmann· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.