Jul 2026· American journal of hematology/oncology· Vol 101, pp. 2533 - 2545· 0 citations· 51 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Patients with ALL who develop CD19‐relapse after CD19‐directed therapy have poor outcomes and limited therapeutic options.
Abstract
CD19‐directed therapy remains the mainstay treatment for relapsed/refractory B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, treatment patterns and outcomes following CD19‐negative (CD19‐) relapse remain poorly defined. We retrospectively analyzed 65 adult patients with ALL who developed CD19‐relapse after CD19‐directed therapy. TP53 mutations and BCR::ABL1‐like ALL were each identified in 27.7% (n = 18) of patients. Forty‐six patients (70.8%) received one CD19‐targeted therapy, whereas 19 patients (29.2%) received ≥ 2 prior to CD19‐relapse. Overall, 60 patients (92.3%) received blinatumomab, and 23 (35.4%) received CAR T‐cell therapy. The median time from the initiation of the most recent CD19‐targeted therapy to CD19‐relapse was 155 days (range, 13–1946). The median follow‐up of the entire cohort was 32.7 months (IQR, 15.1–90.3). The median event‐free and overall survival (EFS and OS) was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.5–4.5) and 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.8–24.7), respectively. In multivariate analysis, receipt of ≥ 2 CD19‐directed therapies was associated with both inferior EFS and OS, HR 2.17 (95% CI, 1.10–4.29; p = 0.03) and HR 3.05 (95% CI, 1.40–6.62; p = 0.005). The complete remission rate following first salvage therapy was 47.5% and 72.1% any time following CD19‐relapse. Sixteen (34.8%) of 46 patients evaluated had subsequent CD19 re‐expression, 5 of whom subsequently received CD19‐directed therapy, and all 5 patients responded. Patients with ALL who develop CD19‐relapse after CD19‐directed therapy have poor outcomes and limited therapeutic options. However, since this study lacked a comparator cohort of patients with CD19‐positive relapse, the independent prognostic impact of CD19 negativity could not be determined.
Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) is associated with relapse, treatment refractoriness, and poor prognosis. Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B‐ALL, its efficacy and safety in CN...
Yang-Hong Yu, Hui Xu, Lei Xue et al.· Cancer Medicine· 0 citations
Importance
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy induces high remission rates in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but relapse, which is often due to antigen loss, remains a major challenge. Dual-targeting CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell strategies may be associated with re...
Xinyu Wan, Yan-Jing Tang, Jiao-Yang Cai et al.· JAMA Oncology· 1 citation
Background Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) have emerged as a serious late complication of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. While large-scale studies have characterized the epidemiology of t-MNs, the mechanisms underlying their development remain incompletely understood, and cases...
Manqi Su, Chentong Huang, Zhan-Na Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
CD7-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promising efficacy in relapsed or refractory (R/R) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL). However, relapse remains a major obstacle. We generated a recyclable CD7 CAR-T cells (CD7 CARRecyclable) and conducted a ph...
Jia-Hua Niu, Kun Wang, Shi-Zhen Qiu et al.· Transplantation and Cellular...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.