AutoFiction : Measuring AI ability to execute long-horizon writing tasks

CraftAlign: Feature-Grounded Evaluation and Revision Guidance for AI Stories

Large language models can now generate fluent and complete stories, yet many outputs still feel formulaic and unnatural because of cliches, over-explanation, linear causal progression, and stereotyped endings, an immediately recognizable AI flavor. Existing detection and evaluation methods often stop at source labels or holistic scores, while revision methods typically target predefined issues through localized edits, limiting their ability to support multiple plausible revision strategies or guide story-wide changes in information release, causal organization, and ending treatment. We introduce CraftAlign, a framework that aligns AI stories with the craft of human storytelling by both assessing Human/AI writing patterns and providing revision guidance. CraftAlign comprises two learned modules and an inference-time guidance pipeline. A feature estimator built on Qwen3.5-9B predicts 304 explicit writing features spanning style and narrative. A class-conditional energy model scores the resulting feature configuration against Human and AI writing patterns, conditioning on the original writing prompt when available. At inference time, CraftAlign applies schema-valid structured perturbations, selects changes that move the feature configuration toward the Human writing pattern, and converts them into natural-language guidance for a separate editor to rewrite the full story. Experiments show that CraftAlign accurately distinguishes Human and AI writing patterns and that its guidance outperforms revision baselines across editors and in a human study.

SAGE: Self-Evolving Storyboard Skills via Attribution-Guided Rule Evolution

Storyboards turn screenplays into visual shot plans for automated short drama production. Professional storyboarding relies on tacit directorial expertise and remains an industrial bottleneck. Large language models can automate this step, but methods for supplying directing knowledge face three challenges: (1) Knowledge acquisition: the craft remains implicit in exemplars or must be written manually. (2) Knowledge refinement: authored knowledge is not evaluated against execution outcomes, and opaque generation prevents feedback attribution to the knowledge behind each decision. (3) Knowledge injection: injecting all knowledge exceeds usable context, while manual selection for every narrative group does not scale. We present SAGE (Skill with Attribution-Guided Evolution), a deployed framework that learns, attributes, evolves, and routes directing knowledge from expert demonstrations. SAGE derives rules that are independent of episode content by contrasting each training screenplay with its expert storyboard. During generation, the model records each narrative group's adopted rules. Combining these records with localized feedback enables targeted updates to individual rules. Evolved rules form scenario packages with a routing index, so each group retrieves only a bounded set appropriate to its situation without expert intervention. On 18 test episodes across three genres, SAGE scored 77.8 on a rubric validated by experts, versus 77.1 for professional directors. Deployed for 14 days on Virtual Film Studio, SAGE produced 1,344 narrative group outputs; 87.2 percent were accepted without substantive edits, and the production team recorded over 83 percent less authoring time per episode. We release PROSE, the first public dataset pairing screenplays with storyboards by professional directors across 68 episodes: https://github.com/creDreams/PROSE.

A Comparison of Speech and Typing Input for Creative Generative AI Tasks

Generative AI systems, such as ChatGPT, are increasingly integrated into how users work and create content. The most common way to interact with these systems is through text-based prompting, typically produced by typing on a keyboard or using speech-to-text. While speech input is supported in generative AI systems, little research has examined how speech and typing differ for prompt creation. We conducted a user study (N = 40) comparing two modalities for writing prompts—speech and typing—across two common generative AI tasks: image creation (e.g., a self-portrait) and text creation (e.g., a blog post). We examine behavioural metrics (prompt length, time, and iterations) and subjective perceptions of the experience and generated output. Our results reveal that input modality significantly influenced prompting behaviour but did not lead to measurable differences in subjective evaluations.

NARU: A Benchmark for NARrative Evolution and Cultural Nuance Understanding in Japanese Extreme Long Video

NARU, a benchmark designed to evaluate Narrative evolution and Reasoning on cultural Understanding in Japanese long-form video, is introduced, a hierarchical memory-based annotation pipeline that transforms raw video into structured event, narrative, and cultural annotations, then generates questions via task-oriented synthesis and iterative shortcut removal.

ClueWeaver: Reward-Guided Dual-Agent Evidence Reasoning for Compact LLMs on Literary Long Narratives

Humanities and social science research requires close reading of long narrative materials such as novels, scripts, archives, and case reports, yet many users have limited access to costly proprietary long-context models. Compact, locally deployable language models are a practical alternative, but directly feeding them an entire long context remains costly, hard to inspect, and prone to missing sparse evidence. We present ClueWeaver, an evidence-aware dual-agent framework for long-narrative question answering with compact local models. A Finder identifies passages containing answer-critical clues through retrieval-guided segmentation, while an Interpreter derives the answer from the selected evidence, produces rationales with paragraph-ID citations, and applies an internal self-calibration pass for high-risk questions. Both agents are optimized with reward-guided reinforcement learning: Finder rewards emphasize evidence retention and faithful paragraph-ID references, and Interpreter rewards emphasize correctness, grounding, and concise explanations. This decomposition makes evidence selection and reasoning more inspectable than end-to-end prompting. Experiments across multiple long-context narrative question answering and claim verification settings show that ClueWeaver substantially improves local end-to-end language models while providing evidence coverage and paragraph-referenced reasoning traces. Code is available at https://github.com/Ameame1/ClueWeaver.

SSS Framework: A Think-First, AI-Second Model for AI-Assisted Writing.