Skip to content
Open access

With AI, It Seems a Fact: Things Act Back

Aug 2026 · Journal of Business Anthropology · Vol 15, pp. 1-7 · 0 citations · 11 references

TL;DR

This editorial opens the Spring issue of the Journal of Business Anthropology with a few thoughts on one of the core themes that runs through all the essays and seems to be a defining feature of AI: that AI appears to have finally made it an indisputable fact that things act back.

Abstract

This editorial opens the Spring issue of the Journal of Business Anthropology. The issue consists of a collection of nine themed essays on artificial intelligence (AI) and business anthropology, edited by Matt Artz and Adam Gamwell, who have also written an introduction to the collection. In this editorial, we do not, therefore, summarize each essay and the insights of the collection, as we would usually do. For such a summary, please read the introduction by Artz and Gamwell. Instead, we offer a few thoughts on one of the core themes that runs through all the essays and, more generally, seems to be a defining feature of AI: namely, that AI appears to have finally made it an indisputable fact that things act back, being responsive in and through their relations and interactions with humans – an issue that has been explored and discussed extensively among anthropologists and other social and human scientists in the recent decades. 

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

AI and Business Anthropology: Introduction to the Themed Essays

If those who believe that AI is already reshaping the conditions of anthropological work prove correct, the implications may extend beyond methodology to something more fundamental: a transformation in what it means to know anthropologically and, ultimately, in what it means to be an anthropologist.

Matt Artz, Adam Gamwell · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence from the Perspectives of Philosophy, Sociology and Communication

The article argues that AI should be understood not only as a technological system, but also as a social, cultural and political force reshaping human values and everyday life, and concludes that AI must be assessed in an interdisciplinary way.

Edvardas Rimkus · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Communicating with AI

Comparing AI with animals, aliens, and deities is highlighted, highlighting both the promise and the limits of extending the authors' concepts of mind and meaning beyond the human case.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence and the Death of the Author:

How the concept of the death of the author in a metaphorical sense discussed by Barthes is currently being turned into a technological one is examined and analyzed to address the gap regarding what kind of thing AI-generated artworks are or should be referred to.

I. Aleksandruk, O. Palchevska, Alina Androshchuck · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The Animal, the Artificial Intelligence, and the Author:

This study argues that Ishiguro redefines intelligence by moving away from anthropocentric and logic-based cognitive models, and explores how Klara's AI consciousness mimics the sensory processing of nonhuman animals rather than the narrative consciousness of humans.

Priya Sharma, Saroj Bala · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Reply to Critics

I begin my suggesting that the instincts that accompanied early, 1970s, work in the sociology of scientific knowledge – that we were doing something important – have turned out to be sound. Fifty years later responses to an account of those early years lead to deep discussions about artificial intelligence, the nature...

H. Collins · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.