Aug 2026· Journal of Computer Assisted Learning· 0 citations· 14 references
TL;DR
The findings highlight the importance of promoting responsible use through clear policies, training, and assessment design, offering practical implications for integrating GenAI within higher education systems.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming assessment practices in higher education, offering opportunities for efficiency and personalization while raising concerns related to academic integrity, fairness, and responsible use. Understanding how different users perceive and engage with GenAI is essential, particularly within rapidly advancing digital contexts such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
This study investigates students' and instructors' perceptions of GenAI integration in assessment and examines the relationships among perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, attitudes, and responsible use, including the moderating role of user type.
An explanatory sequential mixed‐methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 193 participants (163 students and 30 instructors) using a validated survey instrument. Correlation, regression, mediation, and moderation analyses were conducted, complemented by qualitative thematic analysis of open‐ended responses.
Findings revealed significant positive relationships among all constructs. Perceived usefulness and ease of use were combined into a higher‐order Technology Acceptance Model construct that strongly predicted attitudes. Perceived risk significantly influenced both attitudes and responsible use, emerging as the strongest predictor of responsible behaviour. Attitude partially mediated the relationship between technology acceptance and responsible use. User role significantly moderated this relationship, with a stronger effect observed among instructors. Qualitative findings indicated generally positive but cautious attitudes, highlighting concerns about over‐reliance, accuracy, and academic integrity, alongside a continued intention to use GenAI.
GenAI adoption in assessment is shaped by a balance between perceived benefits and risk awareness. The findings highlight the importance of promoting responsible use through clear policies, training, and assessment design, offering practical implications for integrating GenAI within higher education systems.
GenAI is already embedded in students’ study practices, but that its use is largely self-directed rather than strongly shaped by institutional context, which highlights the need for pedagogical and institutional strategies that support critical, reflective, and responsible use.
Å. Nygren, Anna-Li Eriksson, Jeanette Sjöberg et al.· Education and Information Te...· 2 citations
Examination of lecturers’ perceptions of GenAI in higher education suggests that lecturers’ perceptions of GenAI are socially situated and systematically shaped by gender, age, and teaching experience, and that these perceptions in turn are strongly associated with frequency of use and depth of adoption.
Abeer Mahmoud Watted, Michelle Attard Tonna, P. Camilleri· Journal of Information Techn...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that GenAI plays a dual, context-dependent role, particularly by supporting idea generation, material development, and pedagogical innovation, and suggests that GenAI should be used as a collaborative tool.
Findings point to the need for AI literacy curricula that develop students’ critical, ethical, and self-regulatory capacities in Indonesian higher education contexts.
Yuliana Friska, Angga Hidayat, Ani Kusumaningsih et al.· Indonesian EFL Journal· 0 citations
Student Experience Impact and General Perceptions were the primary psychological predictors of institutional AI engagement, while gender and School of Education affiliation were the significant demographic predictors.
Fatima Khalifeh, Raúl Santiago, Ramon Palau· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The findings show that teachers’ adoption of GenAI was not simply determined by tool availability or perceived efficiency, rather, teachers’ perceptions of usefulness and ease of use developed through cycles of experimentation, prompt refinement, peer sharing, and ethical reflection.
D. Maher, Keith Heggart, Antonette Shibani et al.· Education sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.