It is suggested that strengthening Performance Trust and prioritizing workload-relevant trust components can support low-burden human--AI collaboration.
Abstract
Generative AI is increasingly used in work settings, where users often iteratively refine prompts to obtain outputs that match their intentions, potentially increasing cognitive workload. Although trust in AI is considered important for effective human--AI collaboration, how trust relates to cognitive workload---and which trust components matter most---remains unclear. This study experimentally examined trust--workload relationships in prompt-based interaction with an image-generation system. Twenty-three employees performed task-oriented image-generation tasks under two interaction conditions (Automatic vs. Prompt) designed to induce workload differences. Trust was measured using eight MDMT Performance Trust items, and cognitive workload was assessed using the Gas Tank Questionnaire. Analyses proceeded in three steps: (1) item-level correlations, (2) structural equation modeling (SEM) of Performance Trust predicting cognitive workload while controlling for Condition and Theme, and (3) a trust-items-only regression reporting standardized coefficients (\(\beta\)) with 95\% confidence intervals. SEM showed that higher Performance Trust was associated with lower cognitive workload (\(\beta=-0.385, p<.001\)), explaining 35.0\% of the variance (\(R^2=0.350\)). Item-level regression further indicated unequal contributions among trust components. These findings suggest that strengthening Performance Trust and prioritizing workload-relevant trust components can support low-burden human--AI collaboration.
High cognitive load elevated both subjective trust and behavioral reliance on AI, and cognitive constraints rebalance dual trust pathways-weakening analytic evaluation while amplifying heuristic outcome reliance-by revealing how cognitive constraints rebalance dual trust pathways.
Xiaojiao Chen, Yonghan Liu, Yiran Ma et al.· Human Factors· 0 citations
The findings suggest that trustworthy AI integration requires addressing pre-existing structural failures before introducing algorithmic decision support, and offer design recommendations for AI-supported appraisal systems, with implications for HCI research and organizational practice.
Andreas Harnindito, Akshat Sawarni· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
TTF theory is extended by demonstrating that technology fit serves as a key mechanism linking AI capabilities with user trust and satisfaction, providing a more comprehensive explanation of value creation in AI-supported task environments.
Anggraeni Widya Purwita, R. Bisma, Ghea Sekar Palupi et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
The findings show that AI learning companion usage significantly strengthens algorithmic trust and learning adaptability, while cognitive load management enhances both engagement and adaptability and self-regulated learning adaptability emerges as the strongest predictor of learning innovation performance.
Muhammad Husin· Journal of Information Techn...· 1 citation
As more and more AI-powered tools and platforms are adopted in organizations to automate routine tasks, support decision-making, and improve efficiency, adoption is often lopsided, with employees embracing the system while also wondering whether it can effectively perform work-critical tasks. This study examines how or...
Wittika Thangchan, W. P. Wall· Decision Science Letters· 0 citations
It is shown that trust in AI is associated with both the facilitation and the perceived constraint of organizational decision-making, and it highlights accountability as a candidate governance mechanism for preserving self-reported human judgment in AI-assisted environments, pending behavioral validation.
Youngkeun Choi· Human Systems Management· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.