Aug 2026· International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology· 0 citations· 11 references
TL;DR
It is argued that disclosure statements alone are an insufficient governance response, and the Innovation–Efficiency–Responsibility (IER) framework is proposed, comprising three pillars, twelve operational levers and a five-level institutional maturity scale.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved within a single decade from a specialised computational method to a general-purpose research instrument that now touches almost every stage of the scholarly lifecycle, from problem formulation and literature synthesis to experimentation, analysis, writing and peer review. This paper asks three connected questions: where AI produces genuine innovation in research rather than incremental automation; where it delivers measurable efficiency; and what conditions of responsible use must hold for those gains to be epistemically and ethically legitimate. The study adopts a structured narrative review of peer-reviewed literature, policy instruments and editorial guidance published between 2016 and 2026, and synthesises the evidence through thematic coding into a conceptual model. We find that innovation gains cluster in domains where AI compresses very large combinatorial search spaces—protein structure prediction, molecular and materials screening, and simulation surrogates—while efficiency gains are widest in language-intensive and data-curation work, where they are also most weakly audited. The dominant risks are epistemic rather than merely procedural: fabricated citations, homogenisation of research questions, and an illusion of explanatory depth in which fluent output is mistaken for understanding. We argue that disclosure statements alone are an insufficient governance response, and propose the Innovation–Efficiency–Responsibility (IER) framework, comprising three pillars, twelve operational levers and a five-level institutional maturity scale. Implications are drawn for universities, funders, publishers and policymakers, with particular attention to resource-constrained institutions in India and comparable settings.
An integrative, stage-based analysis of how contemporary AI systems—particularly large language models, retrieval-augmented systems, and tool-using agents—are reshaping the research lifecycle, from the earliest formulation of a research question through data analysis, manuscript preparation, peer review, and post-publi...
Dr. Gagandeep Singh, Ravi Ranjan, Anirudh Gupta, Harinakshi Aravind Shetty· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
This paper examines the tension between the benefits of generative artificial intelligence (AI) for scientific research and the unresolved governance questions that accompany its rapid adoption. Drawing on an academic roundtable held at the AI for Science and Innovation Workshop (Scuola IMT Alti Studi Lucca, April 2026...
F. Castellacci, Tommaso Ciarli, Yuan Gao et al.· 0 citations
A conceptual framework explaining the role and impact of Artificial Intelligence on engineering work is generated and the relationships between these factors are illustrated through a conceptual framework that will serve as the groundwork for further, empirical research.
Prarthona Paul, Cindy Rottmann· Proceedings of the Canadian...· 0 citations
While AI is driving profound changes not only in science and technology but also across society as a whole, addressing technical challenges— such as mitigating hallucination, preventing catastrophic forgetting in continual learning, and improving data efficiency must be accompanied by the development of control and gov...
Sang-Hoon Oh· Liberal Arts Innovation Cent...· 0 citations
A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 340 peer-reviewed journal articles (2015-2025) proposes an actionable, multi-stakeholder future research agenda and outlines practical governance interventions, offering an essential roadmap for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers navigating the algorithmic workplace.
Arne Jeppe, Tim Brée, Erik Karger et al.· Management Review Quarterly· 0 citations
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is a computer-generated technology that allows data and information to be created through synthesis. It also allows for code generation and simulation of complex scenarios. By leveraging GenAI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and coding agents, researchers can develop new applic...
Yu-Cheng Pei· SHS Web of Conferences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.