Jul 2026· International Journal of Banking and Finance· Vol 21, pp. 20-39· 0 citations
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm performance among 338 firms (747 firm-year observations) listed on Bursa Malaysia from 2018 to 2023. Using a fixed-effects panel regression approach, the analysis evaluates the direct impact of ESG performance on financial performance, measured by return on equity (ROE), and market performance, measured by Tobin’s Q (TQ). The results show that ESG performance alone does not significantly enhance firm outcomes, with ESG scores displaying a significant negative association with market valuation, suggesting that the high costs and complexities of implementing ESG initiatives may outweigh short-term benefits in investor assessments. Firm-specific characteristics are found to moderate the ESG - performance relationship. Larger firms show weaker market outcomes when ESG engagement is high, reflecting delayed returns and greater implementation challenges. In contrast, external validation through inclusion in the FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia Index (F4GBM) positively moderates the ESG-TQ relationship, underscoring the importance of recognition by sustainability indices in strengthening market confidence whereas Shariah compliance does not exhibit significant moderating effects. The findings highlight the multifaceted and context-dependent nature of ESG outcomes in Malaysia, offering valuable implications for firms, investors, and regulators seeking to align sustainability with financial and market success.
Amid the growing prominence of sustainability considerations in financial decision‐making, the question of how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance translates into measurable financial outcomes has become particularly salient for industries exposed to intense regulatory pressure and environmental s...
Fatih Akdeniz, Birol Güven, Mustafa Zuhal· Corporate Social Responsibil...· 0 citations
Purpose: This study examines whether Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance is associated with Return on Equity (ROE), whether firm size moderates the ESG–ROE relationship, and whether this differs between listed non-financial firms in Indonesia and Singapore during 2021–2024, integrating resource-base...
Background: The average market valuation of SRI-KEHATI firms declined during 2020–2024, raising questions about whether investors value environmental, social, and governance performance differently.
Objective: This study examines the separate effects of environmental, social, and governance performance on firm value an...
Venny Ratnasari Narulita, E. Endri· Inkubis Jurnal Ekonomi dan B...· 0 citations
This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and firm value in Taiwan’s financial and insurance sector and investigates the moderating role of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Using panel data from 52 listed financial and insurance firms during 2015–2022, the study employs...
Chen-Ying Lee· Journal of Applied Finance &...· 0 citations
This study examines both the linear and nonlinear relationship between overall Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm market value, while also comparing the effects of the Environmental, Social, and Governance dimensions in publicly listed companies from the European Union. The analysis is bas...
A. Staugaitis, Č. Christauskas· International Journal of Fin...· 0 citations
This study investigates the impact of ESG performance on firm value among listed energy and utilities firms in emerging Asian markets (excluding China) over 2015–2024. Firm value is proxied by Tobin’s Q and ESG performance by the LSEG overall ESG score (0–100). The study tests whether institutional ownership and GHG em...
Nopparat Sujarit· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.