Skip to content
Review Open access

Evaluation of predictability of tooth movement using different aligner brand: A prospective clinical study

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology · Vol 16 · 0 citations · 9 references

TL;DR

Clear aligner predictability remains moderate and varies according to aligner brand, arch, tooth group, and movement type, whereas molar distalization and selected transverse expansion movements showed comparatively higher predictability.

Abstract

To evaluate the predictability of orthodontic tooth movement using different clear aligner brands through a secondary-data synthesis of published clinical evidence available up to 2025. A secondary-data-based comparative clinical evidence study was conducted using published clinical studies and systematic reviews that evaluated planned versus achieved orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners. The main multi-brand dataset was extracted from a 2025 longitudinal clinical study comparing Angel Aligners, Invisalign, Spark, and HeySmile in adult patients requiring dentoalveolar expansion. Additional movement-specific data were extracted from published studies on Invisalign and other clear aligner systems. Predictability was defined as the percentage of clinically achieved movement relative to planned digital movement. In the 2025 multi-brand adult expansion study, Angel Aligner showed the highest overall predictability at 60.002%, followed by HeySmile 59.895%, Spark 59.275%, and Invisalign 57.153%. Lower-arch expansion was more predictable than upper-arch expansion. Tooth-group analysis showed the highest predictability for second bicuspids, followed by first bicuspids, first molars, and canines. Earlier Invisalign evidence reported mean overall tooth movement accuracy of 41% in 2009 and approximately 50% in 2020. Extrusion, canine rotation, premolar derotation, torque, and mandibular incisor intrusion were among the least predictable movements, whereas molar distalization and selected transverse expansion movements showed comparatively higher predictability. Clear aligner predictability remains moderate and varies according to aligner brand, arch, tooth group, and movement type. Brand-level differences were observed for dentoalveolar expansion, although the evidence is stronger for Invisalign than for newer aligner systems. Clinicians should apply overcorrection, optimized attachments, careful staging, auxiliaries, and refinement planning for less predictable movements.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Effects of tooth position, magnitude, and attachment on anterior tooth movement success in clear aligner therapy: a retrospective cohort study

To evaluate the clinical acceptability, at first refinement, of eight anterior tooth movement categories during Invisalign ® clear aligner therapy in adults and to assess the independent contributions of tooth position, prescribed movement magnitude, and attachment design to outcome. A retrospective...

Adrian Hankewycz, Prasad Nalabothu, Manu Sharma et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predictability of movements achieved with Invisalign® clear aligners: a retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictability of tooth movements achieved with Invisalign® clear aligners and to compare the efficiency of two different types of attachments (conventional vs optimized) for rotational and extrusive movements on the upper dentition. Four hundred forty-seven upper teeth fro...

Gabrielle Paquet, Clarice Nishio, P. Rompré et al. · 0 citations

CLINICAL STUDY Predictability and oral health in clear aligner therapy for mixed dentition: a 12-month prospective study

ClearCorrect® aligners demonstrated clinically acceptable predictability of dental expansion in children with mixed dentition, achieving improvements in anterior crowding and midline diastemas, while also maintaining stable oral health status, and without compromising physiological root development.

Estudo Clínico, Daniel Neves, Desire Cassilha Neves et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Longitudinal Evaluation of Gingival Margin Modifications During Treatment with Clear Aligners: A Retrospective Clinical Study in Growing Patients

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival margin modifications during and after orthodontic treatment with Clear Aligners in paediatric patients. Secondary objectives included assessing the relationship between gingival changes and different types of tooth movement and evaluating the stability of these...

Marco Clementini, C. Pavoni, F. Gazzani et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Patient-Performed Cleaning Methods on the Integrity of Clear Orthodontic Aligners: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: Clear aligner therapy offers an aesthetic and removable alternative to conventional orthodontic appliances. However, aligners are continuously exposed to the oral environment and may undergo changes in surface characteristics, colour and biological contamination during clinical use. Appropriate cleaning i...

S. S., Sachin, Sharath Kumar Shetty B. et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative accuracy of three orthodontic software platforms for mesiodistal tooth-width measurements and bolton analyses in patients with mild to moderate crowding: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to compare mesiodistal tooth-width measurements and Bolton analysis outputs generated by three orthodontic software platforms (3Shape OrthoAnalyzer®, uDesign®, and Titan Dental Design™) against a physical caliper control. The study utilized pre- and post-treatment digital mod...

Hallie Moehring, Qing-Zhao Yu, Zi-Xin Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.