This work studies six functionally distinct web applications, each generated in two prompt variants that are identical except for an appended security-requirements section: a baseline (A) and a security-aware (B) variant.
Abstract
Large language models increasingly generate complete web applications from natural-language prompts, raising the question of whether explicitly requesting security best practice improves the result. We study six functionally distinct web applications, each generated in two prompt variants that are identical except for an appended security-requirements section: a baseline (A) and a security-aware (B) variant. All twelve programs were produced by the same agentic coding assistant and the same model version in a single, non-iterative generation round, and were then analyzed with static, dependency, dynamic and manual techniques, yielding 75 confirmed findings out of 85 candidates. The security-aware variant produced fewer confirmed findings in every application (24 versus 51) and contained no Critical or High issues; the most severe finding was detected only by manual testing. Because the corpus is small and each variant was generated once, we report descriptive observations rather than statistically established effects, and position the work as a preliminary study whose pipeline is being scaled to multiple models and repeated runs.
The results show that English prompts do not consistently produce the best functional correctness or code quality, the impact of prompt language depends on both the programming language and the LLM, and generated code frequently mixes English with the prompt language in comments and string literals.
Saima Afrin, Alessandro Midolo, C. Escobar-Velasquez et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This paper formalizes the structure of prompt-injection artifacts, enabling defenders, red teamers, and cyber threat intelligence (CTI) teams to label, compare, and mutate attacks without relying on fragile string matching.
Multi-SALLM, a benchmarking framework designed to systematically evaluate Large Language Models’ ability to generate secure code, reveals three key findings: functional correctness and security are closely related but not equivalent, and sampling strategy is a critical risk factor.
Mohammed Latif Siddiq, Noshin Ulfat, Nishat Raihan et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This work analyzes query logs from MotherDuck, a cloud analytics platform built on DuckDB, to show that real-world SQL extends far beyond analytical queries, with users frequently employing dialect-specific functionality that LLMs struggle with.
Till Döhmen, Adithya Krishnan, Hamilton Ulmer et al.· The VLDB journal· 0 citations
: Large language models are increasingly being deployed in safety-critical domains, yet remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that circumvent safety alignments. This systematic review synthesizes empirical jailbreak research published between 2024 and 2025, using a PRISMA-guided search protocol, followed by BERTopic-b...
Meda Račaitytė, Hélder Bastos, R. Ribeiro et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 15, 2026
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.