Skip to content
Preprint

TAKE 85: Testing Audiovisual filmmaKer's intEnt across 85 Hours of Film

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 59 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces TAKE 85, the first benchmark for directorial-intent understanding, comprising 398 short films with expert-verified question-answer pairs spanning global and fine-grained visual and audio intent, and establishes directorial intent as a previously overlooked dimension of multimodal understanding.

Abstract

Films communicate through deliberate creative choices, including lighting, color, composition, editing, dialogue, music, and sound. Humans naturally interpret these signals as directorial intent, yet current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are evaluated almost exclusively on understanding what happens rather than why it is presented that way. We introduce TAKE 85, the first benchmark for directorial-intent understanding, comprising 398 short films (85 hours) with expert-verified question-answer pairs spanning global and fine-grained visual and audio intent. Through controlled modality ablations, TAKE 85 enables systematic evaluation of multimodal reasoning. Experiments on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal a substantial gap between perceptual recognition and intentional understanding: while models accurately describe events and narratives, they consistently fail to infer the communicative role of filmmaking decisions. Our results establish directorial intent as a previously overlooked dimension of multimodal understanding: even the strongest model reaches only 58 out of 100, and our ablations show that no input modality is sufficient on its own. All code, Q&As, and models are publicly available from https://github.com/KaiShinozakiConefrey/Take-85

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

CinematicVQA: Benchmarking Film-Grammar Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models

Cinematography, the craft of visual storytelling through framing, lighting, and camera operation, fundamentally shapes how audiences perceive and emotionally engage with video content. While Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have made remarkable progress in video question answering, existing benchmarks primarily focus on identifying low-level techniques rather than understanding their storytelling impact. To address this, we introduce CinematicVQA, the first-of-its-kind benchmark for cinematic video understanding that goes beyond technique recognition to evaluate film-grammar reasoning, utilizing our introduced Cinematic Scene Graph (CSG), a structured representation that links filming techniques to their perceptual effects and narrative functions. Through comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LVLMs, we reveal a striking semantic gap: models consistently perform higher on describing visual presentations than on identifying the underlying techniques. Surprisingly, Chain-of-Thought prompting fails to provide consistent gains and degrades performance for most models, suggesting that current LVLMs lack sufficient cinematic domain knowledge to benefit from step-by-step reasoning. Fine-tuning on \textsc{CinematicVQA-train} yields consistent improvements, particularly for narrative function and multi-hop reasoning. Overall, \textsc{CinematicVQA} serves both as a rigorous benchmark for cinematic evaluation in LVLMs and as a practical dataset for training more film-aware video models.

Shuo Xing, Pooja Verlani, Balu Adsumilli et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

When Text Misleads: Inconsistent-Aware Reasoning for Audio-Grounded Dialogue

A scalable framework that identifies text-biased surface interpretations and converts disagreement regions into conflict QA examples and develops an agentic-style reasoning framework that converts speech into an Audio Twin, a text-readable representation of localized acoustic cues that exposes acoustic evidence to the reasoning model.

Yen-Ju Lu, Yu-Zhe Wang, Yao-Han Guan et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?

Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.

Siyu Yan, Zhuoran Yan, Haiying Xu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Hear2Act: Benchmarking When Prosody Should Change What an Assistant Does

Hear2Act is introduced, a unified evaluation protocol for text and spoken assistants with 480 persona-grounded scenarios, hidden user concerns, and objectively verifiable outcomes that show that prosody matters when lexical evidence is insufficient, and that audio-capable LLMs can recover information from speech but do not reliably carry it into action without an explicit intermediate representation.

Xinyi Liu, H. Nayyeri, Dilek Hakkani-Tur et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

NARU: A Benchmark for NARrative Evolution and Cultural Nuance Understanding in Japanese Extreme Long Video

NARU, a benchmark designed to evaluate Narrative evolution and Reasoning on cultural Understanding in Japanese long-form video, is introduced, a hierarchical memory-based annotation pipeline that transforms raw video into structured event, narrative, and cultural annotations, then generates questions via task-oriented synthesis and iterative shortcut removal.

Yu-Heng Huang, Jian-Lang Chen, Jiayang Song et al. · 0 citations

When Models Hear What They Expect: Diagnosing Prosodic Heuristics in Multimodal Sarcasm Detection

Sarcasm detection is addressed through sarcasm detection, evaluating Qwen2.5-Omni and Qwen3-Omni on Mandarin Chinese and English under five modality conditions that decompose the contributions of lexical content, vocal semantics, and prosodic structure to reveal a shared stereotype of expressive prosody.

Yong-Jian Chen, Pengfei Wei, Yiqun Sun et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.