Jul 2026· Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal· Vol 29· 0 citations
TL;DR
This editorial situates the five peer-reviewed contributions within a legal-technical approach to AI governance: a transdisciplinary approach in which the legal and the technical are fused to add nuance to regulatory forms and practices and to close the legal-technical gap in AI governance and regulation.
Abstract
This editorial introduces the special issue on the legal-technical governance and regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Africa, the product of a project launched by the Data Science Law Lab in collaboration with the Data Science for Social Impact research group at the University of Pretoria. It situates the five peer-reviewed contributions within a legal-technical approach to AI governance: a transdisciplinary approach in which the legal and the technical are fused to add nuance to regulatory forms and practices and to close the legal-technical gap in AI governance and regulation. The contributions move from conceptual foundations, where legal-technical governance is advanced as an analytical framework, through continental norm-making on the transition from African Union soft law to an AI treaty and national policy design on intellectual property in African AI strategies, to the operation of AI systems in practice, addressing the algorithmic sovereignty gap in AI-enabled surveillance in South Africa and Nigeria and the legal status of predictive policing in the fight against cybercrime in Nigeria.
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
Objectives Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed and revolutionized the technological and informational space of the 21st century. AI has also reconfigured the way of relating and interacting with the information system, the work environment, the occupational structure, and the societal space. Within the framewo...
Anca Parmena Olimid, Cătălina Maria Georgescu, D. Olimid et al.· Frontiers in Sociology· 0 citations
A normative analysis of thirteen recent studies on the challenges of technology implementation, ethical trust, and legal regulation suggests that the current governance dilemma stems not only from technological limitations but also from institutional neglect, which enables accountability avoidance.
The results demonstrate that regulatory fragmentation influences data control, technological infrastructure, cybersecurity, normative autonomy, and the protection of rights, and that international cooperation is essential to address transnational risks, but it must ensure balanced participation, respect for national pa...
Frederico Soares de Almeida, Maria Margarete Fernandes de Sousa· Revista de Estudos Interdisc...· 0 citations
A conceptual crosswalk is proposed that maps controls across domains onto shared AI lifecycle stages, exposing redundancy and gaps and set out a research agenda for integrated governance that treats legal, financial, and data controls as a single accountable system rather than three parallel ones.
Ashore-Onisemo Funmilayo· International Journal of Eco...· 0 citations
The central claim is that constitutional and democratic requirements should not be treated as external compliance burdens when embedded into institutional design, they operate as productive constraints that improve legitimacy, implementation discipline, and the long-term trustworthiness of AI-enabled public decision-ma...
C. Oliveira· Open Access Journal of Data...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.