Skip to content
Review

Functional neuroimaging subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aug 2026 · Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · Vol 363, pp. 112312 · 0 citations · 58 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Evidence from functional neuroimaging subtyping studies in OCD supports a neuroimaging-based framework for personalized treatment selection but require prospective validation.

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibits substantial clinical heterogeneity that may reflect underlying neurobiological diversity. Neuroimaging-based subtyping may advance precision psychiatry by identifying biologically distinct subgroups with differential treatment responses. This study systematically synthesized evidence from functional neuroimaging subtyping studies in OCD to identify reproducible neurobiological subtypes, characterize their clinical profiles, and establish a consensus-based classification framework. We reviewed 40 original studies employing machine learning, clustering, normative modeling, or classification approaches, encompassing approximately 8,150 patients. Consensus clustering identified three reproducible neurobiological subtypes. The Limbic-Hyperactive subtype, comprising approximately 40% of patients, exhibited amygdala and insula hyperconnectivity, elevated anxiety levels, predominant contamination and washing symptoms, and favorable response to cognitive-behavioral therapy. The Fronto-Striatal-Hypoconnected subtype, comprising approximately 35% of patients, demonstrated reduced orbitofrontal-striatal connectivity, cognitive inflexibility, predominant checking and ordering symptoms, and a favorable response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The Global-Disrupted subtype, comprising approximately 25% of patients, exhibited widespread connectivity disruption, greater symptom severity, and poor treatment response. Support vector machine classification achieved 81.5% accuracy for subtype assignment, though classification of OCD versus healthy controls showed limited generalizability in multisite settings (AUC 0.567-0.673). These findings support a neuroimaging-based framework for personalized treatment selection but require prospective validation.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Mapping the Heterogeneity of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review of Multi-Omics Integration Studies

Results indicate that multi-omics integration, in addition to explaining the molecular architecture of MDD, also characterizes patient subgroups with pathophysiological mechanisms, dimensions of symptoms, and disease treatment, which demonstrates that there is a shift in psychiatry toward a more mechanistic approach.

Elham Amjad, B. Sokouti · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Shared functional abnormalities within somatosensory cortex in obsessive-compulsive disorder and anxiety disorders: A comparative meta-analysis.

BACKGROUNDS Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been consistently associated with alterations in cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuits, as demonstrated by numerous resting-state fMRI studies. However, given the high prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders and anxiety-related traits in OCD patients, prev...

Xiao-Zhu Wei, Jie He, Xun Li et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

777. Advancing biological subtypes of treatment-resistant depression

This approach advances efforts toward precision neuropsychopharmacology by identifying reproducible brain–behavior relationships that may inform treatment selection and mechanistic targeting and provides a scalable framework for biologically informed subtyping in MDD.

K. Dunlop · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparison of Cognitive Functions in Patients with Autogenous and Reactive Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

Introduction: Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is clinically heterogeneous, and the neurocognitive characteristics of autogenous and reactive obsessional presentations remain insufficiently understood. This study compared neurocognitive performance and exploratory clinical–cognitive associations in strictly classifi...

Hatice Ayça Kaloğlu, Mehmet Ünler, Buket Koparal et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Cognitive heterogeneity in major depressive disorder: Neuroimaging, transcriptomic, and neurotransmitter profiles.

This study provides a data-driven characterization of cognitive heterogeneity in MDD, identifying two cognitive dimensions spanning from relative preservation to widespread impairment, and provides preliminary biological context for interpreting cognitive heterogeneity in MDD.

Yu-Shun Yan, Jia'ao Yu, Liang Zuo et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.