Aug 2026· Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences· Vol 13· 0 citations· 62 references
Medicine
TL;DR
How dynamic changes in IRE1α signaling bias contribute to amyloidogenic progression in AD is examined and whether selective modulation of adaptive versus maladaptive IRE1α outputs may offer stage-dependent therapeutic benefit is considered.
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasingly recognized as a disorder of proteostatic failure characterized by progressive disruption of neuronal protein quality control, culminating in amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation and synaptic dysfunction. Chronic activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response represents one of the earliest molecular alterations detected in vulnerable brain regions and correlates with Braak progression before overt plaque deposition. Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (IRE1α), the most evolutionarily conserved sensor of the unfolded protein response (UPR), functions as a signaling rheostat within this network through its divergent downstream outputs. Under moderate proteotoxic stress, adaptive IRE1α- X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) signaling supports ER proteostasis, preserves amyloid precursor protein (APP) quality control, and favors non-amyloidogenic α-secretase processing. Persistent ER stress, however, drives sustained IRE1α hyperactivation and engages regulated IRE1α-dependent decay (RIDD), which destabilizes microRNA (miRNA) networks that normally constrain beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) expression, thereby favoring amyloidogenic APP processing. Accumulating evidence suggests that aging progressively compromises ER proteostatic capacity, thereby redirecting IRE1α signaling away from adaptive XBP1s-mediated responses toward a predominantly RIDD-driven state. This shift may reinforce a self-sustaining cycle in which accumulating Aβ further amplifies ER stress signaling. Here, we examine how dynamic changes in IRE1α signaling bias contribute to amyloidogenic progression in AD and consider whether selective modulation of adaptive versus maladaptive IRE1α outputs may offer stage-dependent therapeutic benefit.
New mechanistic truths of how m6A-dependent RNA regulation contributes to the progression of AD are compiled and therapeutic opportunities of METTL3/IGF2BP2 axis targeting for novel RNA-based therapies for neurodegenerative disease are discussed.
It is concluded that PS integrate vesicular release machinery with trophic and inflammatory homeostasis; their loss initiates a multi-scale failure cascade that redefines early AD-related neurodegeneration beyond Aβ.
This review synthesizes current knowledge regarding piRNA dysregulation in AD, examining mechanistic links between piRNA loss, transposable element activation, Aβ toxicity, and tau pathology while evaluating therapeutic implications.
S. Taherkhani, Zeynab Sharifiaghdam, Parnian Amani· SVOA Neurology· 0 citations
This review introduces the "metabolic paradox" as an operational descriptor: a concurrent, same-cell mismatch between increased substrate uptake or inflammatory activation and declining bioenergetic efficiency and homeostatic function.
Yue Zou, Yi Ou, Hang Zhao et al.· Biomedicine & pharmacotherap...· 0 citations
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized not only by amyloid-β and tau pathology but also by progressive failure of multicellular homeostasis. The P2X7 receptor (P2X7R), a low-affinity ATP-gated ion channel preferentially activated in extracellular ATP-rich pathological microenvironments, is well positioned to transla...
Findings support a model in which tau dysfunction results from the convergence of molecular aberrations and genetic susceptibility within a pathological network involving amyloid-β, neuroinflammation, and synaptic failure.
S. Sura, S. Jagadeesan, M. A. M. Moklas et al.· Molecular Biology Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.