This work introduces two complementary synthesis-oriented existence-checking methods: a rewrite-based normalization algorithm (RwUn) and a template-based reasoning system (TpUn) that guarantees uncomputation through structured Store-Use patterns.
Abstract
Automatic uncomputation aims to provide programming-language-level support to facilitate the correct and safe use of ancilla qubits in quantum computing, but efforts have only been made for clean ancillas, leaving dirty ancillas unexplored. We present a unified formalization of the uncomputation of both clean and dirty ancillas. For the first time, we prove that checking the existence of uncomputation is coNP-hard. We introduce two complementary synthesis-oriented existence-checking methods: a rewrite-based normalization algorithm (RwUn) and a template-based reasoning system (TpUn) that guarantees uncomputation through structured Store-Use patterns. We implement prototypes of both methods in Qiskit and Python. Compared to the state-of-the-art Reqomp~\cite{reqomp}, RwUn achieves 100% coverage on practical complex-dependency benchmarks, twice the coverage on random classical circuits, and about 50% coverage on random quantum circuits beyond the scope of existing methods, demonstrating broader applicability.
Bona is presented, the first scheduler for dirty-qubit borrowing, built on a novel depth-aware heuristic algorithm, and it reduces nearly 99% of dirty ancillas on average with controlled depth overhead, providing concrete evidence that dirty ancillas offer unique optimization advantages in circuits with certain parallelism.
Xiao-Quan Xu, Chenke Liu, Bo-Ning Meng et al.· 0 citations
Ensuring ancilla safety is a critical correctness requirement for quantum compilation, since ancilla qubits are routinely introduced to implement complex operations with fewer gates and reduced depth. However, formally verifying this property is computationally hard due to state-space explosion in the number of qubits, particularly for dirty ancillae, which carry unknown initial states and must be restored after use. We propose an end-to-end verification-and-repair framework that rigorously addresses both clean and dirty ancilla safety. Our core contribution is a two-step reduction strategy: we first prove that verifying an $m$-qubit dirty ancilla register decomposes into $2m$ independent clean ancilla safety checks; subsequently, we reduce each clean ancilla safety instance to an algebraic commutativity check against Pauli-$Z$ and Pauli-$X$ operators. This approach yields an efficient and naturally parallel verifier and enables actionable diagnosis by classifying violations into logic errors and phase errors. Leveraging this diagnosis, we further design lightweight repair routines that append local single-qubit rotations to eliminate a broad class of local ancilla faults. We implement the full pipeline in a prototype tool using a dual-backend architecture combining decision diagrams and weighted model counting, and validate it on diverse circuits ranging from arithmetic benchmarks to Grover's algorithm. Our experiments demonstrate scalability to thousands of qubits and show that the proposed repairs effectively improve ancilla safety while preserving circuit functionality.
Jiqi Li, Jingyi Mei, Wang Fang et al.· International Conference on...· 1 citation
Grover search, amplitude amplification, and quantum counting all rely on the same reusable subroutine, a phase oracle, whose construction the algorithms literature takes as given: the classical predicate is assumed to be already encoded as a correct, resource-bounded circuit. We turn this assumption into a measured capability. QEncodeBench tasks large language models (LLMs) with encoding classical constraint problems as phase oracles and scores the generated circuits with an adversarially self-validated verifier that decides full solution-set equivalence up to a global phase, with ancillas restored and resource budgets enforced. Sampled basis-state tests, we show, systematically overestimate this ability. Measured this way, models separate sharply: code models without a reasoning mode solve essentially nothing, and enabling native reasoning on identical weights improves accuracy by an order of magnitude. The failures are overwhelmingly semantic rather than syntactic. Two architectures, a unit-verified constraint agent and a neuro-symbolic compilation pipeline, close most of the remaining gap by delegating correctness-critical composition to deterministic procedures. Ablations quantify the contribution of each component, and resource gating exposes an architecture-dependent trade-off between circuit width and depth. Finally, controlled difficulty escalation reveals architecture-specific responses to difficulty structure: different difficulty axes degrade different methods, while the neuro-symbolic pipeline passes every evaluated instance. Code and data are available at https://github.com/chexujun/QEncodeBench.
Xu-Jun Che, Han-Han Wu, Yu-Chen Yuan et al.· 0 citations
As quantum software stacks scale up to support future fault-tolerant quantum hardware and algorithms, quantum compilation is becoming an increasingly important component of the stack. How do we ensure that our software stacks support dynamic algorithms, including patterns such as mid-circuit measurement feedforward and repeat-until-success, with hundreds of logical qubits and billions of quantum operations? To do so, we must re-think how we represent quantum programs beyond straight-line circuits, to representations that include classical structure and dynamism, and make this the default representation to consider when performing quantum compilation. In this work, we present important patterns and algorithms from fault-tolerant quantum applications which admit a structured representation that we argue is crucial to preserve, and set a challenge to the community to compile such representations without unrolling them into straight-line quantum circuits. We also explore the status quo of structured program support in quantum software, and ask ourselves the rhetorical question: how much more efficient can we make quantum compilation tooling when we take into account the additional information from classical structure?
Damian Rovara, Daniel Haag, Mark Koch et al.· 0 citations
A measurement of what diagrammatic post-processing recovers from structural redundancy in the Solovay-Kitaev algorithm, which optimizes for numerical convergence rather than circuit economy, and its output carries structural redundancy that a gate-level compiler cannot see.
Dulari De Silva, A. Mahasinghe, Chon-Fai Kam et al.· 0 citations
Formal verification is becoming increasingly practical for quantum computing, yet the ability of AI agents to construct machine-checkable proofs in this domain remains unmeasured. We introduce Lean-QuantumAlg-Bench and Lean-QIT-Bench, two Lean 4 benchmarks containing 36 and 40 theorem-completion tasks for quantum algorithms and quantum information theory, respectively. Every task compiles in a fixed environment and is evaluated by deterministic proof checking and targeted semantic review, with difficulty weights assigned before model execution. We evaluate four models-GPT-5.5, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4-Pro, and MiniMax M3-within a common theorem-proving framework under two settings: a task-only baseline and library-augmented deduction (LAD), which additionally provides access to a verified domain library. The highest difficulty-weighted scores are 60.4 out of 100 on the quantum-algorithm benchmark and 59.6 out of 100 on the quantum-information benchmark. LAD improves both score and completion rate in all eight model-benchmark comparisons, with gains of up to 15.9 points, providing evidence that verified libraries can strengthen domain-specific proof agents. The results reveal recurring weaknesses of agentic proving in areas such as quantum simulation, quantum learning, quantum information measures, and entanglement theory. Monetary and wall-clock costs per score point also vary substantially across models, highlighting important capability-efficiency trade-offs. We expect these benchmarks to establish a reproducible baseline for developing more capable and reliable proof agents, and to pave the way toward self-evolving AI scientists for advancing quantum information science.
Lei Zhang, Yusheng Zhao, Yimeng Cao et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
