Skip to content
Preprint

AI and the Research Team

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 16 references
Economics

TL;DR

A span-of-control model predicts that a fully codifiable team peaks when effective automation coverage reaches a closed-form threshold, typically near complete coverage, and, among fields with shared primitives that possess an interior peak, those with less irreducibly human task content peak first.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is associated with larger research teams, yet in mathematics, among the most codifiable fields, individual researchers working with AI now produce research-grade results. A span-of-control model reconciles these observations. AI lowers execution cost, which expands laboratory scale, and automates codifiable tasks, which lowers the member share of each unit. Team size is therefore quasi-concave in AI capability, with at most one peak. The model predicts that a fully codifiable team peaks when effective automation coverage reaches a closed-form threshold, typically near complete coverage, and, among fields with shared primitives that possess an interior peak, those with less irreducibly human task content peak first. Under explicit priors, the 90 percent forecast intervals for the fully codifiable peak span 2026 to 2030.

View source

Similar papers

2026

The AI Revolution

It is up to the pioneers, leaders, and curious thinkers who must now lead us through the most disruptive time in the authors' history.

Jörg Storm · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Efficiency Matters in Autonomous Research

This paper argues that the efficiency of the solution-search process is an equally important but often overlooked dimension of performance, and proposes evaluating AR systems using the area under the curve (AUC) of the Pareto frontier, alongside final outcome quality.

Hai Yang, Yuanlong Cao · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Dynamics of Intelligence Explosions

AI is increasingly being used to help with AI R&D. Under certain conditions this feedback loop might be able to produce an intelligence explosion, with rapidly escalating AI capabilities. I explore the mathematics of the most explosive possibilities, with an eye to understanding what drives the dynamics. I show that si...

Toby Ord · 0 citations
Review

of AI and

This paper presents one of the most comprehensive mappings to date, analysing 16,564 publications identified through Web of Science and refined to 4,626 core contributions using a hybrid method that combined computational topic modelling, AI-assisted filtering, and human validation.

C. de Saint Laurent, Vlad P. Glăveanu, Ioana Literat et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Learning Beyond the Individual: Building Collective Capability in Human AI team

Artificial intelligence is entering the workflow faster than most organizations are redesigning learning. This paper argues that the central L&D challenge is no longer individual AI literacy alone, but the collective capability of teams to reason, coordinate, challenge, remember, and improve with AI. An integrative rev...

Hemant Tale, Satwik P. M. · 0 citations
Review

Returns to intelligence: Worker and firm adaptation to advances in AI

Analyzing work patterns of nearly 200,000 software developers at 500 firms suggests benchmarks alone are insufficient for evaluating economic responses to AI progress, as new model capabilities reshape worker tasks and propagate unevenly across firm types.

Suproteem K. Sarkar, Luke Melas-Kyriazi, M. Agarwal et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.