Skip to content
Meta-analysis Open access

Adverse effects of removable orthodontic aligners: A systematic review with single-arm meta-analysis

Jul 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21, pp. e0350741 · 0 citations · 86 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Short-term pain and minor apical root resorption appear to be the most frequently reported adverse effects of removable orthodontic aligners, although the certainty of evidence varies across outcomes.

Abstract

Background Removable orthodontic aligners are widely used due to their aesthetic appeal, removability, and perceived comfort. However, evidence regarding their potential adverse effects remains limited. Objective To identify and synthesize the adverse effects associated with removable orthodontic aligner therapy. Methods This systematic review with single-arm meta-analysis evaluated adverse effects related to removable orthodontic aligner therapy. Seven electronic databases (Cochrane, Embase, LILACS, Livivo, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) and gray literature sources (ProQuest Dissertations and Google Scholar) were searched without language or date restrictions. Two calibrated reviewers independently selected studies. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, most outcomes were synthesized narratively; meta-analyses were conducted only for pain/discomfort, apical root resorption, and plaque. Results Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, including 10 randomized controlled trials, 6 non-randomized clinical studies, and 18 cohort studies. Randomized trials were predominantly at low risk of bias, whereas most non-randomized and cohort studies were at moderate to high risk. Pain and apical root resorption were the most frequently reported adverse effects. Pain peaked within 24 hours, decreased by day 3, and was minimal by 1 week. Apical root resorption was generally small, with a mean linear loss of −0.33 mm (95% CI −0.55 to −0.11) and a volumetric loss of −4.37 mm³ (95% CI −5.51 to −3.24). Findings on plaque at 3 months were inconclusive. Other reported outcomes included periodontal changes, enamel demineralization, white spot lesions, speech alterations, halitosis, open gingival embrasures, temporomandibular symptoms, and awake bruxism. Conclusion Short-term pain and minor apical root resorption appear to be the most frequently reported adverse effects of removable orthodontic aligners, although the certainty of evidence varies across outcomes. Speech alterations, discomfort, and white spot lesions have also been reported.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Clinical and Esthetic Outcomes of Vestibular Socket Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Vestibular socket therapy (VST) is a minimally invasive technique for immediate implant placement (IIP) in compromised extraction sockets that reconstructs the deficient buccal plate while preserving the crestal soft tissue. Despite growing clinical adoption, the randomized evidence on its predic...

Y. Soliman, Nadine Gräfin von Krockow, Fatma E. A. Hassanein et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Clinical Outcomes of Sequential Distalization with Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Sequential distalization with clear aligners is increasingly used as a non-extraction approach for correcting Class II and selected Class III malocclusions. However, evidence remains heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols, anchorage strategies, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review a...

M. Baxmann, Márton Zsoldos, Krisztina Kárpáti · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Does invasive surgical acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement increase root resorption? A harms-focused systematic review

Background Orthodontically induced root resorption (RR) is frequent, and invasive surgically accelerated orthodontic (ISAO) procedures may increase it. This study aimed to assess the effect of ISAO on RR in teeth adjacent to surgically treated segments compared with conventional orthodontic treatment. Methods Following...

Mohamad Radwan Sirri, Mohammad Osama Namera, Mohamad Yaman Salahi Alasbahi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Do Simplified Complete Denture Protocols Preserve Patient-Reported Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND Conventional complete dentures (CDs) fabrication involves multiple clinical and laboratory steps. Simplified protocols reduce treatment burden. However, their impact on patient-reported outcomes remains debated. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the oral health-related quality of...

Goes Timbó Isabelle da Costa, Sarah Vitória Lutif de Lemos Moura, Yuri Barbosa de Azevêdo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Short and long-term skeletal and dental effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives. This systematic review assessed the skeletal and dental effects produced by the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) in growing patients with Class II malocclusion and mandibular retrusion, examining both immediate and long-term treatment outcomes. Material and methods. A comprehensive electro...

Shubhnita Verma, A. Thakur, Pasupureddi Keerthana et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.