Skip to content
Review

Impact of Structural Anomalies and Anatomical Variations on Operative Time in Abdominal Surgery-Systematic Review.

Aug 2026 · Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y. Print) · 0 citations · 59 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is shown that incorporating anatomical variability into surgical planning may reduce avoidable operative delays and improve operative efficiency, and the magnitude of operative time impact is influenced by procedural complexity and preoperative planning.

Abstract

Prolonged operative time is associated with increased surgical complications, resource utilization, and cost. While factors such as surgeon experience and patient habitus are well recognized, the impact of anatomical anomalies and variations remains poorly quantified. This systematic review evaluates the influence of abdominal structural anomalies and anatomical variations on operative time. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a search of PubMed (2000-2025) identified 82 eligible studies. Operative-time impact was assessed using added operative time relative to reference benchmarks. The unit of analysis was the procedure-level observation. Observations were stratified by procedure category and surgical complexity and summarized using median added operative time and range. Among procedure-level observations with available benchmarks, 13 of 14 (92.9%) structural anomalies, 48 of 54 (88.9%) situs inversus cases, and 10 of 11 (90.9%) other anatomical variants demonstrated increased operative time relative to baseline. Structural anomalies were associated with larger median increases, particularly in colorectal procedures, whereas anatomical variations demonstrated a more heterogeneous effect across procedural systems. Higher-complexity procedures, including pancreatic operations, showed greater absolute increases in operative time. Preoperative identification of anatomical differences was associated with attenuation of operative delays. Structural anomalies are frequently associated with increased operative duration, whereas anatomical variations demonstrate a more variable and context-dependent effect. The magnitude of operative time impact is influenced by procedural complexity and preoperative planning. Incorporating anatomical variability into surgical planning may reduce avoidable operative delays and improve operative efficiency.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Comparative analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in primary vs. revision meningioma surgery: A propensity score-matched study

It is indicated that revision meningioma surgery achieves comparable intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes to primary resection, and these findings reassure that revision surgery does not inherently increase operative risk when performed with appropriate patient selection.

Ishav Y. Shukla, Ali Ebada, Nicholas Bever et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Procedural stacking as an independent marker of thirty-day morbidity in plastic surgery: A national cohort study.

P Procedural stacking is associated with higher 30-day morbidity independent of operative time and primary-procedure wRVUs, and it was most strongly associated for reoperation and readmission and during prolonged operations.

Miracle Uzoekwe, Shaan Sekhon, Casey Tompkins-Rhoades et al. · 0 citations
Jun 2026

Operative-Time Gradients Reveal Miscalibration in Microsurgical Risk Prediction

Generalized ACS NSQIP morbidity prediction was accurate in aggregate but systematically miscalibrated across the operative-time gradient, overestimating risk in shorter operations and underestimating it in longer operations.

Shaan Sekhon, Miracle Uzoekwe, Casey Tompkins-Rhoades et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Surgical management of rectal cancer: Analysis of procedural patterns and perioperative outcomes in 510 patients.

This institutional experience illustrates the progression of surgical practices, highlighting the growing implementation of sphincter-preserving techniques and less invasive methods, and profoundly impacts surgical decision-making, facilitating an increased number of sphincter-preserving surgeries.

Amir Zaffar Lone, Mehraj Ul Islam Teeli, F. Parray et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Video-Based Assessment of Operative Complexity in Endometriosis: Associations of AAGL 2021, #Enzian, and rASRM Classifications with Operative Time and Advanced Surgical Procedures.

Findings support the complementary use of AAGL 2021 for standardized assessment of surgical complexity and #Enzian for detailed anatomic mapping, while rASRM remains useful as a widely recognized global staging system.

K. Aslan, I. Kasapoğlu, B. Kosan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.