Using a portable EEG device with a low participant burden and a deep learning model to distinguish between the typical development group (TD) and the NDD group, comprising children with ASD, ADHD, and ASD + ADHD is used.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are common neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in children and often co-occur (ASD + ADHD), complicating the diagnosis. The diagnostic process is lengthy and subjective, relying heavily on expert knowledge, which limits accessibility. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers potential as a biomarker but requires skilled technicians for measurements and can be stressful for children with NDDs. This study aimed to provide a more accessible diagnostic support tool. We used a portable EEG device with a low participant burden and a deep learning model to distinguish between the typical development group (TD) and the NDD group, comprising children with ASD, ADHD, and ASD + ADHD. Resting-state EEG data were recorded for 5 min using the portable HARU-2 device, which features three channels placed on the forehead of 163 participants (87 TD, 76 NDD). A deep learning model combining a one-dimensional convolutional neural network and a transformer encoder was developed to analyze the EEG data. In 5-fold cross-validation, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 and a balanced accuracy (bACC) of 67.5% for classifying NDD and TD. Exploratory evaluation of out-of-fold predictions stratified by clinical phenotype showed an AUC of 0.793 and bACC of 75.0% for ASD vs. TD, 0.817 and 79.5% for ADHD vs. TD, and 0.667 and 62.7% for ASD + ADHD vs. TD. These findings suggest that portable EEG devices combined with deep learning models may serve as accessible adjunctive tools for NDD screening in children.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition characterized by diverse behavioral, cognitive, sensory, and communication profiles, making early diagnosis and personalized intervention challenging. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled the developme...
S. K, Lakshmi Annapurna Y· Journal of Visualized Experi...· 0 citations
It is suggested that urinary MM-defined NDD-A and NDD-B phenotypes are associated with distinct cognitive and brain structural characteristics and may provide a novel framework for understanding within-disorder heterogeneity and cross-disorder phenotypic overlaps.
Masatoshi Yamashita, Qiulu Shou, Sayo Hamatani et al.· Journal of neural transmissi...· 0 citations
The proposed electroencephalography-based ASD detection method was evaluated against previous approaches using the same datasets, showing a substantial improvement in performance, and the need to evaluate the proposed approach on larger datasets to further ensure model generalization.
B. S. Falih, Mohannad K. Sabir, A. Aydın· Brain Topography· 0 citations
A comparative temporal deep learning framework for EEG-based ASD classification by evaluating principal component analysis (PCA) and multiscale principal component analysis (MS-PCA) as feature representations combined with a recurrent neural network with bidirectional long short-term memory (RNN-BiLSTM) and a temporal...
M. Muliyadi, Melinda, Yuwaldi Away et al.· Journal of Electronics Elect...· 0 citations
Children and adolescents with ASD exhibited lower empathy capabilities than control subjects, which may be attributed to dysfunctions in the salience and social brain networks.
Yong-Lu Wang, Zhang-Liang Ma, Zhiyi Wang et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
It is shown that subject-level validation, preprocessing, and architectural decisions materially influence EEG-based ADHD classification, and EEG-MSCNet contributes both a model and a systematic evaluation framework.
Javier Sanchis, T. Kechadi, Miguel A. Teruel et al.· Multidimensional systems and...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.