Factors related to the baseline malocclusion severity significantly affect the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration and this information could be used for informed practice and patient communication.
Abstract
Objective
To assess the impact of baseline malocclusion severity on the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration.
Materials And Methods
An unrestricted, independent search was conducted on the Invisalign ClinCheck database of a private practice for patients without any missing anterior teeth and whose treatment was finished between April 2021 and December 2024. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the feature selection Boruta algorithm (random forest algorithm) was implemented to identify important predictors for the number of aligners (prescribed, used) and treatment duration.
Results
A total of 404 patients were included (age: 29.57 [10.7] years). Mean numbers of prescribed, used and unused aligners were 72.21 (37.52), 65.63 (30.40) and 6.57 (14.09), respectively. Important predictors of the numbers of the prescribed and used aligners were relatively similar and included molar and canine relationships, maxillary crowding, overjet, presence and number of missing or extracted posterior teeth, overbite, presence and number of teeth in posterior crossbite and midline discrepancies. Treatment duration was associated with baseline maxillary crowding, molar and canine relationships, overjet, overbite, midline discrepancies and the presence and number of missing or extracted posterior teeth.
Conclusions
Factors related to the baseline malocclusion severity significantly affect the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration. This information could be used for informed practice and patient communication, including future evaluation of the biological and environmental footprint of aligners.
The results of individual studies suggest that aligners could be a viable technique for the correction of mild to moderate open bite with good vertical control in contrast to deep bite malocclusions where treatment efficacy is still limited.
Hajar Ben Mohimd, Houda Neani, F. Zaoui et al.· Journal of Orofacial Orthope...· 0 citations
Stability of comprehensive occlusal and temporomandibular rehabilitation in Class II adults is governed less by the magnitude of the sagittal discrepancy than by the vertical and periodontal–alveolar reserve available to compensate it.
Nasimov E. E., Rasulova Sh. R., K. U. et al.· Adolescência e Saúde· 0 citations
Although the twin block is the most commonly used appliance for the treatment of Class II malocclusion, the clear aligner industry has developed systems with integrated mandibular advancement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of Twin block appliances, standard AngelAligner clear aligner...
Giacomo Scuzzo, Giuseppe Scuzzo, Elena Calzadilla-Suárez et al.· BMC Oral Health· 0 citations
While both protocols produced comparable occlusal outcomes, the 3-day protocol required more refinements and visits without improved predictability, suggesting wear duration plays a key role in aligner effectiveness.
Alexandra T. Brown, Maya Rifai, Kiana Saadatmand et al.· Clinical Oral Investigations· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.