Mar 2026· RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren· 0 citations· 25 references
Medicine
TL;DR
CEM demonstrates comparable performance to CE-MRI for assessing lesion size and bilaterality in ILC, however, CE-MRI remains superior for detecting multicentric disease, a key factor in surgical planning.
Abstract
Abstract Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) exhibits an infiltrative growth pattern with frequent multifocal, multicentric, and bilateral involvement, often leading to underestimation on conventional imaging. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for preoperative locoregional staging of ILC. Materials and Methods Women with histologically confirmed ILC who underwent both CEM and CE-MRI for preoperative staging were included in this retrospective single-center study. 46 of 70 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Two dedicated breast radiologists independently and blindly reviewed all examinations. The number of enhancing lesions, maximum lesion diameter, multicentricity, and bilaterality were recorded. Quantitative variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while paired categorical variables were compared using McNemar’s test. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Cohen’s kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results CEM and CE-MRI showed strong concordance in lesion size assessment, with no significant differences between modalities (p > 0.05). Agreement for bilaterality detection was high for both techniques, with no statistically significant differences. CE-MRI detected a significantly higher number of multicentric cases compared with CEM (p < 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was good to excellent across all parameters. Conclusion CEM demonstrates comparable performance to CE-MRI for assessing lesion size and bilaterality in ILC. However, CE-MRI remains superior for detecting multicentric disease, a key factor in surgical planning. CEM may represent a complementary imaging tool in selected cases. Key Points CEM and MRI show comparable accuracy for lesion size assessment. MRI demonstrates superior sensitivity for detecting multicentric disease. Multicentricity detection may impact surgical planning in selected patients. Citation Format Colarieti A, Minelli P, Bonetti A et al. Preoperative Staging of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: CEM or CE-MRI?. Rofo 2026 DOI 10.1055/a-2906-1608
MRI provides superior accuracy in assessing tumor size and disease extent and remains the preferred staging modality, however, CEM offers excellent performance in evaluating multifocality, multicentricity, and laterality, making it a valuable alternative when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated.
Micheal Saber Nan Georgy, R. H. Abdallah, Ahmed Gamal Eldeen Othman et al.· Clinica Terapeutica· 0 citations
DLSCT showed high concordance with MRI for several locoregional imaging features of rectal cancer, and may provide complementary information, particularly when MRI is contraindicated or inconclusive, but these findings do not establish equivalence to MRI or diagnostic accuracy against histopathology.
S. Mazziotti, Giorgio Ascenti, Tommaso D'Angelo et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to identify imaging predictors of upgrade to invasive carcinoma (IC) in patients with biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) based on morphological features and semi-quantitative parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE...
V. Urban, Z. Milosevic, Z. Bukumirić et al.· Radiology and Oncology· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Tongue carcinoma requires accurate preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (DOI) for optimal management and prognostication. The 8th AJCC/UICC TNM staging system recognizes DOI as a key determinant of T-stage, risk of nodal metastases, and survival. Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) offers excellent soft...
Anamika Das, Jyoti Kumar, Swezal Lohia et al.· Journal of Clinical Ultrasou...· 0 citations
Findings do not support delaying MRI solely to minimize presumed biopsy-related effects on DOI assessment, and MRI systematically overestimates DOI compared with final histopathology, but this discrepancy does not appear to be influenced by biopsy technique or biopsy-to-MRI interval.
N. Gardenal, E. Cancellieri, G. Ottaviani et al.· Clinical Oral Investigations· 0 citations
For staging of localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), Swedish guidelines recommend either four-phase computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), while international guidelines prioritize MRI. Few head-to-head comparisons of CT and MRI are available.
Consecutive patients with lo...
Frida Karlsson, Marco Gerling, C. Villard et al.· British Journal of Surgery· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.