Aug 2026· International Journal of Molecular Sciences· Vol 27, pp. 7465· 0 citations· 97 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This critical narrative review applies a parameter–exposure state–mechanism–endpoint framework to oncologic PDT and distinguishes spatially restricted primary photochemical injury from downstream multicellular effects and appraises the evidentiary thresholds for immunogenic cell death (ICD) and systemic immune claims.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines a photosensitizer (PS), light, and molecular oxygen to generate cytotoxic reactive species, but nominally similar regimens can produce different biological responses because prescribed inputs do not directly specify the biologically active exposure state. Here, this intermediate state is treated as a multidimensional profile defined by PS localization and photoactive availability, the intratissue light field, oxygen dynamics, and vascular conditions at illumination. The relative contributions of direct tumor-cell injury, vascular damage, inflammatory signaling, and adaptive immune modulation also depend on drug–light interval (DLI), treatment sequence, vascular architecture, and tumor–host context. This critical narrative review applies a parameter–exposure state–mechanism–endpoint framework to oncologic PDT. It distinguishes spatially restricted primary photochemical injury from downstream multicellular effects and appraises the evidentiary thresholds for immunogenic cell death (ICD) and systemic immune claims. It also proposes reporting considerations and translational priorities to improve study comparability. PDT mechanisms should be interpreted against measurable treatment parameters rather than presumed from a PS label or prescribed dose alone.
Overall, PDT combination design should be guided by whether adjunctive agents support or undermine photosensitizer accumulation, oxygen availability, ROS-mediated cytotoxicity, and immune activation, when selected according to mechanistic compatibility.
Ilaf Naser, D. Bartusik-Aebisher, Barbara Smolak et al.· Biomedicines· 1 citation
No detectable ROS generation or tumor cell cytotoxicity in vitro is observed using luciferase-engineered tumor-associated macrophages and verteporfin, and complementary Monte Carlo simulations show that achievable photon fluxes are several orders of magnitude below established thresholds for cytotoxic PDT.
Ji Tae Park, Sudip Timilsina, Rebecca C. Harman et al.· Photochemistry and Photobiol...· 0 citations
Melanoma is characterised by profound immune evasion, and although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed clinical management, durable responses remain limited to a subset of patients. Therapies that induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) can enhance anti-tumour immunity by converting dying tumour cells into...
Lisa Van der Heyden, Steve Vanlanduit, E. Smits et al.· Biomedicines· 0 citations
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a light-activated modality that kills cells through photosensitizer-triggered reactive oxygen species, but its efficacy is strongly shaped by oxygen availability and by whether photochemistry proceeds through Type I or Type II pathways. In oxygen-rich settings, Type II PDT mainly generat...
I. V. da Cunha, M. Caetano, N. Bessas et al.· Biophysical Reviews· 0 citations
Phototherapy has become a significant research direction in tumor therapy owing to its high spatial selectivity, low systemic toxicity, and excellent biocompatibility. In recent years, diverse strategies including photodynamic therapy (PDT), photothermal therapy (PTT), photoimmunotherapy (PIT), and photogas therapy (...