This taxonomy shows how verbal reinforcement is reshaping agent development, while also defining the challenges and opportunities for building more capable and aligned agents.
Abstract
Natural language is emerging as a primary feedback channel for improving language agents, capable of conveying intent, preferences, and causal structure in forms interpretable by both humans and modern language models. We call this paradigm Verbal Reinforcement Learning (VRL) and offer the first unified account of it. We organize the field around a single axis, \textit{when} verbal feedback takes effect in an agent's lifecycle and \textit{what} it modifies, yielding three pillars: (1) \textbf{Language as Grounding Signal}, where language defines the task itself by specifying goals, states, and reward structures; (2) \textbf{Language as Deliberative Feedback}, where natural language guides reasoning at test time without the need to update model parameters; (3) \textbf{Language as Learning Signal}, where language-based feedback shapes model parameters through training. Within each pillar, we synthesize representative work, distinguish key subcategories of approaches, and outline the distinct role language plays in shaping agent behavior. Together, this taxonomy shows how verbal reinforcement is reshaping agent development, while also defining the challenges and opportunities for building more capable and aligned agents.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has improved the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of tasks. However, token-level RL assigns an action's advantage to the entire generated response, including tokens specifying the parsed action, reasoning chains, and malformed content. Although the environment...
Zi-Yi Chen, Yan Zhang, Jian-Hui Wei et al.· 0 citations
These findings motivate a state-action controller that starts from the base model action and selectively edits it using structural readouts, without requiring a complete predicted belief state as an intermediate representation.
This survey develops a mechanism-driven framework for separating effects of reinforcement learning, and organizes methods along three axes— learning-signal type, policy/data regime, and optimization granularity—and decomposes their training stacks into reusable motifs spanning advantage construction, drift control, den...
Liu Yang, Han Zhu, Zheng-Yang Zhong et al.· Unmanned Systems· 1 citation
As human--AI interactions become more conversational, full-duplex speech language models capable of natural real-time dialogue are growing in importance. Beyond generating appropriate responses, these models must coordinate turn-taking, backchanneling, and floor management in real time. Reinforcement learning (RL) prov...
Kyudan Jung, Hyunsin Park, Yoonhyung Lee et al.· 1 citation
This work first adapts the model to the domain using supervised fine-tuning on synthesized spoken question-answering data and shows that RL improves the accuracy on GSM8K beyond levels previously achieved for speech models only with supplementary reasoning traces, and establishes a new state-of-the-art for mathematical...
A fundamental bottleneck for translating thoughts to speech is the high physical cost of motor input forcing a strict tradeoff between communication speed and expressivity. Generative AI offers a promising solution by expanding highly abbreviated text input into fluent sentences, significantly reducing the motor burden...
E. Lacosse, Pablo Tano, Daniel C. McNamee· 0 citations