The Tri-Layer Sieve is presented, a middleware defense that sanitizes retrieved evidence through cross-embedding-space clustering with an independent judge model, structural filtering of trigger-payload artifacts, and LLM consistency verification, and exploits a key weakness of retrieval-stage poisoning.
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external corpora, but implicit trust in retrieved documents creates a critical attack surface: PoisonedRAG shows that a handful of crafted passages can dominate dense retrieval and steer generation toward attacker-chosen answers. We present the Tri-Layer Sieve, a middleware defense that sanitizes retrieved evidence through cross-embedding-space clustering with an independent judge model, structural filtering of trigger-payload artifacts, and LLM consistency verification. The design exploits a key weakness of retrieval-stage poisoning: a single document must satisfy one embedding geometry, one internal Trigger-Payload structure, and one generation objective - rarely all three simultaneously, a fragility that persists even against an adaptive attacker who paraphrases around it. On Natural Questions, HotpotQA, and MS-MARCO with Contriever retrieval (k=50), the Sieve reduces black-box Attack Success Rate from 67.0/87.0/64.0% to 3.0/14.0/4.0%, mitigates white-box HotFlip attacks from ~74% to 27.8% on NQ with Layer 3 enabled, and drives poisoned-document MRR to 0.000, while restoring clean accuracy from 13-33% under attack to 58-76%. Under an architecture-aware adversary who paraphrases triggers to evade the structural filter, enabling the consistency layer halves adaptive ASR (32.0% to 15.0% on NQ) while raising clean accuracy by 18 points, at an added latency of ~16-19 s/query under live retrieval.
This work presents RAGSieve, which constructs a reference matched to each detection scope, which requires poison labels, a trusted corpus, or training to be constructed.
Power-domain large language models increasingly rely on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to access standards, maintenance records, and equipment knowledge. This external knowledge channel also introduces a security risk: a small number of retrieval-optimized documents can displace authentic evidence without modifyi...
Qiu-Cheng Ban, Jun-Rong Liu, Zai-Neng Jiang et al.· 2026 2nd International Confe...· 0 citations
This work introduces RAG-NAROK (Retrieval-Anchored Generation Negation And Response Quality Collapse), a RAG attack framework that adapts to the query text and exploits the transparency inherent in RAG pipeline to first extract the legitimate source identities, then generate Anchor-Specific Refutation documents.
It is proved that, under an honest-majority assumption and a representation-level separation condition, RAGSentinel exactly recovers a poison-free majority-sized context.
Yueyang Quan, Anjun Gao, Yu Xia et al.· 0 citations
ToxicRAG is presented, a one-document-per-target attack that expresses misinformation as a coherent knowledge-update narrative that matches or exceeds the strongest evaluated baseline in every combination of dataset--model combinations.
Hao-Zhe Lu, Jia-Qiang Li, Xin-Yuan Zhu et al.· 0 citations
KFS-RAG is proposed, a defense that mitigates information leakage by reformulating the retrieved context by identifying a small set of influential keywords from the retrieved context via an attention rollout plus a causal perturbation mechanism.
Ziliang Zhang, Yu-Bo Zhu, Wei Tong et al.· 0 citations
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 15, 2026
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026