Skip to content

IntroConformal: Conformal Factuality Guarantees for Large Vision-Language Models via Introspective Signals

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 48 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces IntroConformal, a training-free Conformal Risk Control (CRC) framework that provides finite-sample, distribution-free factuality guarantees and proposes verification probability, a stronger score capturing the model's self-administered judgment on claim factuality.

Abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved strong multimodal performance, yet ensuring the factual correctness of generated content remains challenging. Existing methods that provide statistical guarantees on factuality typically rely on external verifiers or generation-time confidence signals, which introduce auxiliary dependencies or often fail for confident but incorrect outputs. We argue that reliable factuality control can instead be achieved through introspective signals derived from the model itself. We introduce IntroConformal, a training-free Conformal Risk Control (CRC) framework that provides finite-sample, distribution-free factuality guarantees. We first instantiate it with layer-wise semantic stability, a conformity score derived from hidden-state representations, and then propose verification probability, a stronger score capturing the model's self-administered judgment on claim factuality. Across multiple LVLM architectures, IntroConformal satisfies the conformal risk guarantee while substantially reducing abstention and achieving competitive or superior claim-level discrimination relative to external verifier-based baselines.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Solver Verdicts: Generative Reward Models for Autoformalization

Generative Verification (GenV) is introduced, which distills an offline Z3-equivalence oracle into a reference-free, continuous reference-equivalence score by repurposing the language model's native vocabulary space and theoretically proves that structural, verdict-only verification heuristics are mathematically bounde...

Vikash Singh, Debargha Ganguly, Aman Goel et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TRAPSBench: Vision-Language Models Encode but Fail to Express Epistemic Restraint

When visual evidence is occluded or chaotic, models should abstain. In this paper, we show that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can internally distinguish when abstention is required, but fail to express it anyway. We introduce TRAPSBench, a procedurally generated video benchmark of 1,404 matched physics pairs in which a...

Fnu Pramono, J. Cai, Sourabh Kulkarni · 4 citations · ⚡1
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

SFAD: Speculative Factuality-Aware Decoding

SFAD is presented, a speculative decoding framework that enhances contextual faithfulness without inference degradation and substantially improves faithfulness while achieving $2.48\times$ speedup, offering a practical solution for efficient LLMs.

Guan-Qiao Chen, Di Wang, Lijie Hu · 0 citations
#small language model Preprint Aug 2026

Localize-Then-Decide Guarantees for LLM Judgments

This work proposes a Localize-Then-Decide framework, which restores the monotonic relationship between confidence and disagreement risk and enables high-probability agreement guarantees in large language models.

Xinyue Li, Yi Zhou, Guanqun Cao et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Saying Less: Fine-Grained Alignment for Informative and Faithful Vision-Language Models

This work proposes a fine-grained alignment framework that couples dense reward signals at the data level with precise credit assignment at the algorithmic level to prevent response-level shared advantages from allowing local hallucinations to compromise all other valid outputs within the same response.

Xing-Ming Long, Jie Zhang, Yue-Cong Min et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Still There, No Longer Seen: Exposing Compression-Induced Risk in Large Vision-Language Models

Visual token compression reduces the inference cost of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, aggregate robustness measures do not reveal whether a particular adversarial failure is induced by compression or inherited from the underlying model. We define a compression-specific failure (CSF) as an adversarial in...

Qian-Kun Li, Yuechen Zhang, Bo-Wen Chen et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Jun 3, 2026

MIT researchers teach AI models to interpret charts

The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.