TL;DR
This work proposes an LLM-guided cutting-plane management framework that removes dependence on domain-specific training data and substantially reduces reliance on expert-crafted configurations.
This paper finds that solutions produced at the early search stage of MILP solvers are often structurally close to the solutions found after full-budget search, and proposes a new solver-informed paradigm that shifts the learning target from variable assignment to early-to-final consistency.
Cutting planes (cuts) are essential for solving mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problems, as they tighten the feasible solution space and accelerate the solving process. Modern MILP solvers offer diverse cutting plane separators to generate cuts, enabling users to leverage their potential complementary strengths to tackle problems with different structures. Recent machine learning approaches learn to configure separators based on problem-specific features, selecting effective separators and deactivating ineffective ones to save unnecessary computing time. However, they ignore the dynamics of separator efficacy at different stages of cut generation and struggle to adapt the configurations for the evolving problems after multiple rounds of cut generation. To address this challenge, we propose a novel dyn amic sep arator configuration ( DynSep ) method that models separator configuration in different rounds as a reinforcement learning task, making decisions based on an incremental triplet graph updated by iteratively added cuts. Specifically, we tokenize the incremental subgraphs and utilize a decoder-only Transformer as our policy to autoregressively predict when to halt separation and which separators to activate at each round. Evaluated on synthetic and large-scale real-world MILP problems, DynSep speeds up average solving time by 64% on easy and medium datasets, and reduces primal-dual gap integral within the given time limit by 16% on hard datasets
Machine learning methods have shown that data-driven policies can accelerate mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) solvers, but many such approaches remain difficult to inspect, adapt, and deploy because the learned policy is represented as an external predictor or other opaque model. By contrast, explicit solver logic is easier to understand and integrate, but is usually hand-designed rather than learned from solver feedback. We study whether the automatic design of MILP solver logic can instead be cast as LLM-guided closed-loop search over executable white-box components evaluated directly by end-to-end solver behavior. To this end, we propose a closed-loop program evolution framework for MILP solver auto-design, implemented through PySCIPOpt, and instantiate it on the joint design of a cut selector and a branching rule. Candidate programs are iteratively generated, loaded into SCIP, and evaluated by direct execution on MILP instances, with the resulting feedback guiding performance-based selection, targeted repair, diagnostic reflection, and diversity-aware population maintenance. The method outputs explicit solver components that can be inspected, modified, and deployed within standard solver workflows. Across four benchmark families, we find that LLM-guided program evolution can discover competitive domain-specialized policies in several settings.
Mixed-integer programming (MIP) lies at the core of operations research and industrial optimization. While large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise in automated MIP modeling from natural language, they prioritize semantic correctness but overlook formulation strength, severely bottlenecking the efficiency of downstream solvers. We propose FormuEvo, an LLM-guided evolutionary framework for automated discovery of solver-efficient MIP formulations. FormuEvo frames MIP formulation design as evolutionary optimization over the symbolic space of MIP formulations, represented as executable modeling programs, by iteratively generating, evaluating, and selecting stronger candidates via LLM-driven crossover, mutation, and repair operations. To move beyond blind exploration, FormuEvo introduces a solver-informed diagnosis mechanism that exploits fine-grained solver statistics as verbal gradients for targeted refinement. Additionally, a structured memory abstracts prior experience into reusable modeling strategies, avoiding redundant exploration while enabling zero-shot transfer to unseen problems and bootstrapping smaller LLMs. Experiments across diverse linear and non-linear problems demonstrate that FormuEvo discovers formulations that significantly outperform both expert-designed formulations and existing LLM-based approaches, accelerating solvers by up to 5.5$\times$, with distilled knowledge transferring effectively across problems and model scales.
This work proposes a pipeline that introduces a novel regularization architecture balancing performance and complexity, and mitigate the side effects of automated tuning through two novel components: a symbolic pruning mutator and a complexity-aware mutation gate that explicitly filters out mutations leading to excessive code growth.
Combinatorial problems appear in numerous industrial applications. A common approach is to formulate these problems as declarative constraint models that can subsequently be compiled to and solved by a range of back-end solvers. Recent work shows that Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce correct models from natural language, but even a correct model can be expensive to solve because performance remains sensitive to modelling choices. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs can automate performance-oriented model reformulation. Inspired by Automatic Heuristic Design (AHD), we use an evolutionary framework in which an LLM proposes candidate reformulations that are verified and benchmarked against the user-defined baseline model. We compare AHD-adapted search strategies that control which prior attempts, instructions, and measured feedback enter each prompt. Existing retention strategies prioritize recency or performance, but do not explicitly diversify the context. To cover this gap, we introduce Profile-Diverse Retention (PDR), which applies Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) to instance-level runtime vectors to retain behaviourally diverse attempts. We systematically evaluate the strategies on eight CSPLib problems using validation-based final model selection. The results show that: (i) iterative reformulation can produce substantial held-out speedups; (ii) strategies that keep the retained context diverse outperform those that retain only recent or the fastest attempts; and (iii) validation-based selection improves the held-out speedup of every strategy.