The results suggest that, for intelligent user interfaces in engineering design, the representation exposed to the user is a central part of the interaction design, not merely a preprocessing step for the optimizer.
Abstract
Intelligent design interfaces that rely on preference-based optimization are most useful when their suggestions are both meaningful to users and feasible within the target domain. Procedural models offer compact and editable design spaces, but their native parameters can be entangled and can generate many invalid outputs, causing human-in-the-loop optimizers to waste comparisons. We propose an interaction-oriented representation-learning pipeline for procedural models and study it in automotive wheel design. The method first screens procedurally generated samples using geometric rules and finite-element analysis, then learns a reduced latent space from the screened subset. We further introduce supervised functional alignment, which reserves selected latent dimensions for stiffness, strength-related stress response, or weight so that search can be biased toward functionally meaningful regions. Simulation experiments show that screened reduction improves target-shape retrieval and the feasibility rate of suggestions, whereas unscreened reduction degrades both. Additional simulations show that constraining search along learned functional dimensions accelerates exploration toward target functional properties. A controlled study with 40 participants further shows that a 5D feasibility-aware space yields higher shape similarity and more feasible suggestions than the original 9D procedural parameterization. These results suggest that, for intelligent user interfaces in engineering design, the representation exposed to the user is a central part of the interaction design, not merely a preprocessing step for the optimizer.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) advance 3D indoor scene synthesis, current pipelines fail to retain user-specific preferences across sessions, making immersive authoring a repetitive and physically fatiguing process. We present SPHERE, an adaptive VR generation framework that transforms isolated synthesis into conti...
Hyeonmin Lee, Zheng Wei, Kyungmin Kwon et al.· 0 citations
SHRAV, an architecture-independent computational framework organized around State, Hypothesis, Reason, Action, and Verify, is introduced, an architecture-independent computational framework organized around State, Hypothesis, Reason, Action, and Verify.
These results indicate that reliable long-horizon offline control emerges when expressivity is confined to execution and decision-making operates over support-aligned latent abstractions.
Talha Zaidi, Arslan Munir, Sardar Ali Abbas· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Constrained Locomotion Planning (CLP) for quadrupeds and humanoids, where robots must satisfy collision avoidance, contact consistency, kinematic feasibility, and support constraints, is challenging under high-dimensional dynamics and highly non-convex environments. Recent Model-Based Diffusion (MBD) approaches recast...
The ability to design a tool for a task marks a level of intelligence beyond merely understanding, selecting, or using one. Existing methods for robotic tool design typically optimize a tool's continuous shape and action within a structure that is prescribed or generated beforehand, so the structure itself stays outsid...
Ying-Han Chen, Xi-Yao Tian, Yi-Zan Dai et al.· 0 citations
Image-based traversability estimation is inherently dependent on the robot platform, deployment domain, and mission preferences, which limits the applicability of purpose-trained models. To facilitate domain adaptation, this work aims to reduce the number of required annotations in the target domain using sample-effici...
Simon Schwaiger, David Seyser, Alessandro Scherl et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.