In this large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized with AF, higher education level was associated with lower adjusted hazards of incident HF and AMI over five years, while the association with stroke was weaker.
Abstract
Socioeconomic factors are associated with cardiovascular morbidity. We investigated the association between education level and incident heart failure (HF), acute coronary events (AMI), and cerebrovascular events (stroke) following hospitalization with first-detected atrial fibrillation (AF). In this nationwide retrospective observational cohort study using linked Swedish national registers, we included patients who received a first diagnosis of AF during hospitalization from 1995 to 2008. Education levels were categorized as primary, secondary, or academic, and patients were followed for up to five years. Outcomes were first hospitalization for HF, AMI, or stroke. Associations were assessed using cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models, for men and women separately. Models were adjusted for age, calendar year of AF diagnosis, whether AF was the primary or secondary admission diagnosis, comorbidity diagnoses and thromboembolic risk. The cohort comprised 263,172 patients (mean age 72.5 ± 10.4 years; 56.2% male). Compared with primary education, secondary and academic education levels were associated with lower adjusted risks of HF and AMI in both females and males. For HF, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–1.00) for secondary and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77–0.87) for academic education in females, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.96) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.72–0.80), respectively, in males. For AMI, adjusted HRs were 0.89 (95% CI 0.85–0.93) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.65–0.77) in females, and 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.80) in males. For stroke, lower adjusted risks were observed only in the academic education group. Baseline comorbidity burden and thromboembolic risk were higher in lower education groups. In this large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized with AF, higher education level was associated with lower adjusted hazards of incident HF and AMI over five years, while the association with stroke was weaker. Education level may be considered a risk marker when planning follow-up and preventive care after hospitalization with AF.
Although the presence of AF in patients with ACS was not independently associated with CV mortality, it was independently associated with CV-related hospitalizations despite contemporary treatment strategies, suggesting closer follow-up and more intensive management of ACS patients with AF may be necessary to reduce th...
Murat Gençaslan, Ceyhun Yucel, M. Ardıç et al.· Catheterization and cardiova...· 0 citations
AF is identified as a high-impact cardio-oncologic phenotype in MM and the need for integrated cardiovascular risk stratification and management in this population is identified, even after controlling for age and comorbidity burden.
A. Bolad, I. Motairek, M. Elganainy et al.· European Heart Journal, Supp...· 0 citations
Nearly one in four ischemic stroke patients in this cohort had AF, with older age and metabolic risk factors such as diabetes and obesity showing strong associations, which underscore the importance of targeted cardiac screening to guide anticoagulation and improve secondary stroke prevention.
Jawad Ur Rahman, Attique ur Rehman Jehangiri, Naveed Ahmed et al.· The Professional Medical Jou...· 0 citations
The HF incidence was high, with approximately 1 in 20 individuals developing HF within 5 years after diagnosis of diabetes other than type 1, highlighting a notably high risk of developing HF soon after diabetes diagnosis.
Carl Lejonberg, T. Czuba, Louise Bennet et al.· Diabetologia· 0 citations
Extending visit intervals may be a reasonable option for selected stable patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy for primary prevention, as less frequent visits were not associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events or mortality.
Taku Matsunaga, E. Nakatani, Yasuto Sato et al.· Journal of Health, Populatio...· 0 citations
Age was the strongest and most consistent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes, whereas AF type lost prognostic significance after adjustment, support age and overall clinical burden as key determinants of prognosis, favouring a patient-centred approach over AF subtype classification.
A. López-Pena, Juliana Elices Teja, Olga Durán Bobín et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.