Jul 2026· International journal of social science and human research· Vol 09· 0 citations
TL;DR
The study concludes that Tasawuf ethics can be translated into auditable computational mechanisms when ethical intention, iterative purification, continuous monitoring, periodic auditing, fairness optimization, and transparent limitation disclosure are embedded into the AI development cycle.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence increasingly mediates decisions in recruitment, finance, facial recognition, public service delivery, and criminal risk assessment, yet algorithmic bias remains a persistent ethical and technical threat. This study aims to develop and evaluate an integrative ethical framework that connects Akhlak Tasawuf with Alan Turing's computational theory for the prevention of digital bias. A mixed-methods design was employed using a convergent parallel strategy. Qualitative data were obtained through textual analysis of classical Sufi sources and Turing-related works, semi-structured interviews with 35 experts, and three interdisciplinary focus group discussions. Quantitative data were obtained from bias testing across 12 machine learning systems using benchmark datasets and fairness metrics. The findings produced the Turing-Tasawuf Ethical Model (TTEM), consisting of the Niyyah Protocol, Tazkiyah Pipeline, Muraqabah Module, Muhasabah Audit, Ihsan Optimization, and Tawadu' Disclosure. The model improved the composite fairness score from 0.412 to 0.712, indicating a 72.8% increase after implementation. Expert acceptance was also strong, with an overall mean score of 4.21 on a five-point scale. The study concludes that Tasawuf ethics can be translated into auditable computational mechanisms when ethical intention, iterative purification, continuous monitoring, periodic auditing, fairness optimization, and transparent limitation disclosure are embedded into the AI development cycle.
Six principles of governance of ethical AI are provided, and an emphasis is placed on how AI is a supplement to human judgment in academia and should therefore be implemented with attention to the specific context.
Walid Salamah· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
It is found that even when AI is fully explainable and used only to support human judges, it significantly reduces perceived fairness compared to human-only decisions and with a lack of human involvement and when decisions are non-explainable.
H. L. Bentsen, M. Johannesson· Journal of Law & Empiric...· 0 citations
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become increasingly integrated into recruitment processes, particularly in early-stage candidate screening based on semantic matching between CVs and job descriptions. While embedding-based models promise efficiency and scalability, they also raise concerns reg...
Xhoana Shkajoti, Martina Ullasci, Marco Rondina et al.· 0 citations
This topic piece argues that while confidentiality is a foundational element of academic trust, treating all unpublished manuscripts as absolute secrets can inadvertently delay the dissemination of socially valuable knowledge.
The research paper focuses on how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is disruptive to academic integrity and academic assessment practices in higher education. To deal with the critical lag between technological change and institutional control, the study uses a pragmatic mixed-methodology framework that is org...
Isha Joshi, Sumit Maheshwari· Journal of Artificial Intell...· 0 citations
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most transformative technologies of the twenty-first century, revolutionizing governance, healthcare, finance, education, criminal justice, employment, and public administration. AI-driven decision-making systems increasingly influence legal and administrative proc...
Research Author· European Journal of Law, Int...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.