Aug 2026· Contemporary Accounting Research· 0 citations· 67 references
Abstract
We find that banking relationships built through institutional cross‐ownership influence the granting of loans as well as loan contract terms. Firms that are newly added to institutional cross‐owners' portfolios are more likely to borrow from banks that previously issued loans to other firms within the same portfolio. These related banks charge lower loan interest spreads and offer greater loan amounts than other banks issuing loans to the same borrower. However, such loans also are more likely to include capital covenants in the presence of high shareholder–debtholder conflicts. Thus, lenders appear to value the benefits of common institutional ownership while still protecting themselves against potential risk shifting. The interest spread effect is stronger for borrowers with high information asymmetry, low accounting quality, more financial distress risk, and dedicated institutional common owners. These results are consistent with either direct information flows or indirect signaling effects and are robust to different fixed effects specifications as well as to an identification strategy that exploits common ownership stemming from financial institution mergers. Overall, our study provides evidence that investor networks play a beneficial role in the production and dissemination of contracting‐relevant information and highlights cross‐ownership as a favorable determinant for contracting efficiency beyond traditional accounting measures.
This paper examines whether cross‐ownership, where institutional investors hold equity stakes in two or more firms within the same industry, affects asset–liability maturity mismatches that occur when cross‐owned firms use short‐term debt to finance long‐term assets.
Using a sample of Chinese listed firms...
This study examines the effect of political connections on firms' ability to attract institutional equity capital in Malaysia.
Based on a dataset of 865 Malaysian publicly listed firms comprising 16,190 firm-year observations from 2000 to 2022, we employ an ordinary least squares (OLS) model to examine the r...
Kang-Wan Tan, M. Wong· Asian Journal of Economics a...· 0 citations
Ownership–control disparity, defined as the difference between controlling shareholders’ voting rights and cash-flow rights, is a distinctive feature of corporate governance in Korean business groups. Although prior studies have examined its association with firm value and credit ratings, relatively little evidence is...
Hyunjung Choi· Journal of Risk and Financia...· 0 citations
This study examines the effect of firm attributes and ownership structure on stock returns of listed
consumer goods companies in Nigeria. Adopting an ex-post facto research design, the study
analyzed data from 14 listed consumer goods companies on the Nigerian Exchange Group from
2013 to 2024. Using panel regression an...
Douglas Ogechukwu, Ibeh· Journal of Accounting and Fi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.