Aug 2026· AI and Ethics· Vol 6· 0 citations· 75 references
TL;DR
This study investigates the role that three kinds of epistemic distortions play in contributing to LLM psychotogenicity: filter bubbles, echo chambers, and chat chambers.
A structured survey of AI hallucinations, synthesizing prior research to clarify their evolving definitions, underlying causes, and implications for Information Systems positions AI hallucinations as socio-technical phenomena with direct implications for trust, decision-making, and governance.
Whether AI-associated psychosis warrants recognition as a distinct clinical entity is examined, drawing on clinical and technical viewpoints, and recommendations for clinicians, developers, researchers, and regulators are concluded.
Joshua Au Yeung, H. Morrin, Vincent Ng et al.· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a passive information tool into a responsive conversational system. For individuals with obsessive–compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) that are, in part, maintained by safety behaviors and other negative reinforcement loops, large language models (LLMs) can...
B. Zaboski, E. Sugino, Kyle King· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
The widespread use of LLMs among psychiatric populations has raised concerns regarding their safety and potential iatrogenic impact in the context of AI psychosis. While growing literature conceptualizes AI psychosis and documents case studies, empirical evidence tracing AI-exacerbated psychotic processes remains scarc...
Anna Sterna, Kacper Dudzic, K. Drożdż et al.· 0 citations
A fine-grained hallucination classification framework based on medical knowledge graphs is proposed and a three-tier risk stratification scheme that references FDA medical AI software risk classification standards is established, highlighting the unique characteristics of the medical domain.