Skip to content
Review Open access

How nurses contribute to medical treatment decision-making with physicians: a scoping review

Aug 2026 · BMJ Open · Vol 16, pp. e112842 · 0 citations · 144 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A model is developed that illustrates how the interplay between personal, organisational and cultural factors determines whether nurses’ clinically relevant observations are acknowledged and integrated into medical treatment decisions.

Abstract

Objectives To map existing literature on nurses’ contributions to medical decision-making in hospital care, the factors influencing their involvement and how both nurses and physicians perceive this contribution. Design A scoping review was conducted following Arksey & O'Malley’s framework and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (ScR) checklist Data sources A broad literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. The initial search was performed in October–November 2023 and updated in December 2025, with no time or language restrictions. Eligibility criteria Empirical studies were screened by two independent researchers and included if they reported on nurses’ involvement in or attempts to contribute to decision-making regarding medical treatments for adult patients in the hospital. Data extraction and synthesis Data were charted using a predefined extraction form. Extracted data were coded, grouped and examined inductively to identify recurring patterns, which were discussed and refined by the two reviewers. Results A total of 111 studies were included, encompassing a wide range of study designs and clinical settings. Studies have reported that nurses often contribute to decision-making in subtle ways during ward rounds, multidisciplinary meetings and informal interactions, drawing on their observations and advocating for patients’ interests. Nurses reported moderate involvement, while physicians acknowledged nurses’ expertise but did not consistently recognise their input. We developed a model that illustrates how the interplay between personal, organisational and cultural factors determines whether nurses’ clinically relevant observations are acknowledged and integrated into medical treatment decisions. Conclusion Nurses contribute to medical treatment decision-making in various but often subtle, ways. Unfortunately, their contributions are not consistently recognised within decision-making processes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Shared decision-making in patients with stroke: a scoping review

Abstract Objective To map the existing evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) in stroke care across four dimensions (clinical contexts, decision support tools, influencing factors and implementation outcomes) and to identify key research gaps. Design Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting...

Shu-Ting Wang, Ling Liu, Li-Li Yao et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Critical Care Nurse Practitioner Outcomes: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

AIM To support the development of nursing-sensitive indicators specific to this role. BACKGROUND The role of the advanced critical care nurse practitioner is a relatively new role in the Irish healthcare system. The role is attributed to the provision of high-quality care to patients. Preparing to evaluate the role i...

Mary Ryder, K. O'Dowd, Rachel Egan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Factors Influencing Clinical Reasoning Among Clinical Nurses: An Integrative Review Using the Decision‐Making Ecology Model

Background Clinical reasoning (CR) is a complex, context‐dependent process that is essential for safe nursing care. Existing reviews have primarily focused on nursing students rather than practicing clinical nurses. Rapid changes in patient acuity and the increasing integration of digital technologies into healthcare h...

Ju-Hee Lee, Deokhyun Lee, Hyeran Park · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

Factors Affecting Telehealth Consultation in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review

Objectives The global rise in diabetes highlights the need for innovative healthcare solutions. This scoping review is aimed at identifying and categorizing patient‐reported facilitators and barriers influencing the use of telehealth consultations among people living with diabetes. Methods A systematic scoping review w...

Mahsa Fadaie Fini, T. Shafaghat, Mahdi Radabadi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric pain assessment and management: a scoping systematic review from 2015 to 2025

Introduction Nurses play an essential role in providing care to patients, and having the necessary skills, knowledge, and attitudes for effective pain assessment and treatment is crucial for ensuring best patient outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to review recent research about current nurses' knowledge and attitu...

H. Al-Oran, Yousef Rubbai · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review

Objectives Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilized to support clinical care by capturing health status from the patient’s perspective. Although the application of PROMs in an emergency department (ED) context is expanding, their scope remains poorly mapped. This scoping review aims to identi...

Ninna R. H. Daugaard, Liv M. V. Schougaard, M. B. Søvsø et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.