Skip to content
Open access

Towards an empirically informed framework of Quality 5.0 benefits in South African manufacturing

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · Vol 18, pp. 26-57 · 0 citations · 49 references

Abstract

Quality 5.0 has emerged as a human-centric and sustainability-oriented reorientation of quality management within the broader Industry 5.0 discourse. Defined as a sociotechnical quality paradigm that integrates human well-being, environmental sustainability, organisational resilience and digitally enabled process excellence into a unified value-creation logic, Quality 5.0 remains conceptually underdeveloped and empirically underexplored, particularly in developing-economy contexts. This study aims to explore and operationalise practitioner-perceived Quality 5.0 benefits in South African manufacturing. An exploratory quantitative research design was adopted. Data was collected from 276 manufacturing professionals using a structured questionnaire informed by Quality 4.0, Industry 5.0, sustainable quality management and service-oriented quality literature. Exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation was used to identify underlying benefit dimensions complemented by internal consistency assessment. The analysis revealed a stable four-factor structure comprising process, people, planet and profit benefit dimensions. The findings indicate that practitioners interpret Quality 5.0 not as a continuation of technology-driven Quality 4.0, but as an integrative and stakeholder-oriented quality paradigm in which digital capabilities are reoriented to support human-centric outcomes, environmental responsibility and long-term organisational resilience. The study is exploratory in nature and limited by sectoral concentration. The findings should therefore be interpreted as indicative rather than definitive, providing a foundation for further large-scale and cross-contextual validation. The results offer a diagnostic and sense-making framework for policymakers and industry leaders to identify priority value domains, align technology investments with human and sustainability outcomes and guide context-sensitive Quality 5.0 implementation strategies. The findings suggest that Quality 5.0 is increasingly perceived as a human-centric approach to quality management in manufacturing. The identification of people- and planet-related benefit dimensions indicates growing awareness of workforce development, human–machine collaboration and environmental responsibility as integral to quality performance. In a developing-economy context such as South Africa, this perception highlights the potential of Quality 5.0 to support improved job quality and more socially responsible manufacturing practices. These implications should be interpreted as indicative, with future research required to empirically assess social and workforce-level outcomes. This study contributes to the emerging Quality 5.0 literature by offering one of the first empirically informed operationalisations of Quality 5.0 benefits in a developing-country manufacturing context. It provides a structured measurement foundation to support future theory refinement and empirical testing.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Industry 5.0 in a Metalworking SME: A Quantitative Assessment of Resilience, Sustainability, People-Centredness, and Digital Maturity

This study examines the extent to which a medium-sized Portuguese metalworking company, engaged in the production of aluminium goods for residential exterior applications, has embedded the three foundational pillars of Industry 5.0 - organisational resilience, environmental sustainability, and a people-centred strategy...

André Costa, Vânia Dias, Sónia Longras et al. · 0 citations
Review

IV. NEW PERSPECTIVES ON MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL RESILIENCE

The review synthesizes the performance improvements, operational efficiencies, and strategic advantages that stem from Q4.0 initiatives, providing a structured foundation for future research examining the strategic impact of digital quality management.

Karolina Šūmakarienė, Renata Korsakienė · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Exploring the relationships between successful implementation drivers of Quality 4.0: evidence from developing countries

Digital transformation and automation are fundamental components of Quality 4.0, providing organizations with a strategic advantage by enhancing customer satisfaction and improving financial performance. The primary objective of this study is to identify the key drivers of Quality 4.0 implementation, evaluate their...

Soroush Avakh Darestani, Mahdi Zarepour, Olajide T. Ajewole et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Lean six sigma and sustainability in management research: a scoping review of conceptual and methodological approaches

This paper aims to examine how sustainability is integrated into Lean Six Sigma (LSS) within the existing academic literature. While LSS is widely established as a process-oriented management system for performance and quality improvement, it remains unclear how sustainability is embedded in LSS frameworks, tools a...

C. Pfaff · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Conceptualising family business 5.0 as a socioemotional wealth driven framework for responsible family business transformation

This paper introduces the construct of Family Business 5.0 (FB5.0) as a conceptual domain of Industry 5.0 (I5.0), providing a human-centric framework for sustainable digital transformation in family businesses (FBs). It explores how emerging technologies can be harnessed not only to optimise operations but also t...

Andrew Birkbeck, Lisa Rowe, Bogdan Dumitrășconiu · 0 citations
Open access 2026

BUILDING SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOLS:A STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

This paper addresses the critical need for a structured framework to guide Indian business schools (B-schools) toward sustainable global competitiveness and deep integration of global values. The fundamental objective is to provide a framework that is both strategic and sustainable for B-schools, improving institutiona...

Nanda Kishore Shetty, Sunil M. V. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.