Skip to content

Long-term follow-up of 801 zygomatic implants: a single-centre study.

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery · 0 citations · 20 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This single-center analysis, with survival rates exceeding 97% over 17 years and excellent patient-reported outcomes, suggests that zygomatic implants provide a predictable and durable solution for severely resorbed maxillae.

Abstract

Rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxillae remains one of the most demanding challenges in implant dentistry. Zygomatic implants provide a graftless alternative that reduces morbidity and treatment time. However, long-term data exceeding a decade and including patient-reported outcomes remain limited. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who received zygomatic implants from the year 2007 to 2024 at Rajan Dental Institute, Chennai, India. Data collected from digital archives were evaluated to calculate the cumulative survival rates of zygomatic implants. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on comfort, speech, esthetics, self-confidence, and overall satisfaction were assessed using a Likert-scale questionnaire. A total of 449 patients were rehabilitated with 945 zygomatic implants. Of these, 382 patients rehabilitated with 801 zygomatic implants were included in the study who met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 8.6 ± 4.1 years. Twenty implants failed in 14 patients, yielding a cumulative implant survival of 97.5% and patient-based survival of 96.3%. Statistical analysis demonstrated sustained survival beyond 15 years, with rates of 97.9% (4 years), 97% (8 years), 91.2% (12 years), and 81.7% (>15 years). PROMs indicated high satisfaction: >90% of respondents reported maximal improvement across all domains. This single-center analysis, with survival rates exceeding 97% over 17 years and excellent patient-reported outcomes, suggests that zygomatic implants provide a predictable and durable solution for severely resorbed maxillae. The integration of PROMs and survival modeling highlights the importance of both biological and psychosocial parameters in defining long-term success.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Retrospective Evaluation of Zygomatic Implant Therapy in Patients With Severe Tooth Agenesis and Maxillary Deficiencies: Clinical Outcomes and Safety up to 15 Years of Follow-Up.

PURPOSE This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 27 patients with severe tooth agenesis who underwent zygomatic implants (ZIs) over the past 15 years, with an aim of evaluating the efficacy and safety of ZIs in patients with severe oligodontia and anodontia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who were diagn...

B. Tao, Feng Wang, Yi-Han Shen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Long-Term Clinical Performance of a Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Over 10 Years of Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE To investigate long-term survival and stability of a wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant, soft tissue reactions, and quality of life at least 10 years after implantation. STUDY DESIGN This study is a continuation of previously published single-center trials with 6-month, 3-year, and 5-year results,...

C. Hajema, Emma M. Teunissen, C. Caspers et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Residual Jaw Bone Volume and Five-Year Outcomes of Custom-Made Subperiosteal Implants: A Retrospective Study

Background: Custom subperiosteal implants represent an alternative for severe jaw atrophy, yet long-term quantitative bone predictors remain limited. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate 5-year implant survival and determine preoperative volumetric bone thresholds using 3D CT segmentation. Methods: The unit of an...

Jan Łoginoff, Zuzanna Popińska, Agata Majos et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Ultrashort (4-mm) Implants with Immediate Loading for Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation in Frail Patients of a Retrospective Cohort: A 10-Year Follow-Up

Background: The management of complete mandibular edentulism in frail patients with severe bone atrophy is a clinical challenge. Ultrashort implants (≤4 mm) have been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to bone augmentation procedures; however, long-term evidence in full-arch rehabilitations remains limited. M...

G. Botticelli, A. Viarchi, D. Gerardi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Immediate Loading of 5.2-mm Ultra-Short Implants Supporting Maxillary Overdentures in the Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Prospective Pilot Study

Background: Severe maxillary atrophy often precludes placement of conventional dental implants and frequently requires invasive bone augmentation procedures. This prospective pilot study evaluated a treatment concept using immediately loaded 5.2-mm ultra-short implants connected by a patient-specific CAD/CAM inter-impl...

Pieter-Jan Boderé, Wout Scharff, Cyrille France et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Zirconia full-arch implant-supported prostheses: An up to 8-year retrospective study with 140 jaws from private practice.

PURPOSE To assess the survival and complication rates of 140 monolithic zirconia implant-supported full-arch fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with an up to 8-year follow-up at a private practice setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 140 edentulous jaws underwent complete-arch fixed implant treatment with...

Panos Papaspyridakos, Avinash S. Bidra, Armand Bedrossian et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.