Good oral hygiene and surgical techniques were associated with favorable short-to-mid-term outcomes of implant treatment, and good oral hygiene and surgical techniques were associated with favorable short-to-mid-term outcomes of implant treatment.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the relationships between patient characteristics and surgical techniques and radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) and postoperative complications in individuals receiving dental implants. Electronic medical records (EMR) of adults (age ≥ 18 years) who received at least one dental implant between January 2015 and October 2023 and underwent radiographic evaluation at least 6 months after prosthesis insertion were reviewed. Patient-level variables included demographic, systemic, behavioral, and oral-hygiene characteristics, whereas implant-level variables included implant type, location, and grafting status. Analyses were primarily conducted at the implant level. The oral-hygiene status was retrospectively categorized based on EMR data. MBL was recorded dichotomously based on radiographic evidence of implant thread exposure. Descriptive statistics and exploratory bivariate analyses were performed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, respectively. This study included 218 implants from 109 patients. Most implants were bone-level and placed in the native bone. Grafting was more frequently performed at caries-related sites and in patients with good oral hygiene. Older age was associated with poorer oral hygiene, whereas the education level and smoking status were not significantly associated with the oral-hygiene status. Radiographic MBL and postoperative complications were infrequent. Grafting status was not significantly associated with radiographic MBL. Within the limitations of this retrospective cohort study, good oral hygiene and surgical techniques were associated with favorable short-to-mid-term outcomes of implant treatment. Prospective studies with standardized follow-ups and calibrated radiographic assessments are required to clarify these relationships.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate implant survival and radiographic bone level outcomes after surgical treatment for peri-implantitis, and to identify factors associated with treatment outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgical treatment for peri-implantitis at a uni...
Jiayuan Li, Ziyang Yu, S. Ren et al.· E -journal of dentistry· 0 citations
This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical performance, marginal bone stability, and survival rates of tilted versus axial dental implants placed in compromised alveolar ridges over a 5-year follow-up period, while concurrently evaluating patient-centered treatment outcomes. A cohort of 300 patients who underwe...
In this private-practice cohort, appropriately indicated tooth preservation and implant replacement demonstrated comparable survival and patient-reported outcomes within the observed follow-up period.
Sagar J. Abichandani, Aneendita Dutta· Journal of Prosthodontics· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Few long-term studies compare tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) in the posterior region.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the 5- and 10-year survival and complication outcomes of tooth- and implant-supported FDPs and to assess patient-reported effects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This retrospecti...
Zahra Athab Abduljabbar, L. Hjalmarsson, Victoria Franke Stenport et al.· Clinical Oral Implants Resea...· 0 citations
AIMS
To quantify the incidence and develop predictive models for postoperative sequelae and complications (POSC) and the need for additional grafting after alveolar ridge augmentation with simultaneous implant placement (SARA).
METHODS
This longitudinal retrospective cohort included adults with ridge deficiencies who...
M. Saleh, Hend Abulatifa, Francesco Fanelli et al.· Journal of Clinical Periodon...· 0 citations
Tooth agenesis is associated with reduced alveolar ridge dimensions and altered local anatomy, potentially affecting implant long-term outcomes. This study compared marginal bone loss (MBL), implant survival, and implant success between implants placed in agenesis and non-agenesis sites.
This retrospecti...
S. Heuberer, Lana Cepic, Brenda Laky et al.· International Journal of Imp...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.