Jul 2026· Human-Intelligent Systems Integration· 0 citations· 11 references
TL;DR
Meta-Twins is proposed, a system-of-systems digital twin for data engineering infrastructure, where engineering intent is represented as normalized relational metadata (mirrored state) and continuously enforced by persistent daemon processes (autonomous behavior).
Abstract
Digital twins have become foundational in cyber-physical systems by mirroring asset state and enabling monitoring, simulation, and optimization. However, the data infrastructure that powers modern analytics and AI—including transformation logic, orchestration state, lineage, and data quality rules—is typically encoded across fragmented scripts, configuration artifacts, and logs, making it difficult to audit, evolve, or safely automate. This paper proposes Meta-Twins, a system-of-systems digital twin for data engineering infrastructure, where engineering intent is represented as normalized relational metadata (mirrored state) and continuously enforced by persistent daemon processes (autonomous behavior). Meta-Twins exposes a SQL-native control plane for defining transformations, dependencies, schedules, execution history, and quality gates, thereby decoupling semantics from tool-specific execution mechanics and providing a bounded interface for safe AI-assisted updates. We implement a prototype on Databricks to demonstrate feasibility and portability of the design, and we evaluate Meta-Twins through a structured comparison with procedural pipelines and declarative modeling tools across coupling, transparency, self-service readiness, and resilience. The results indicate that representing infrastructure intent as relational state enables consistent auditability, deterministic execution, and reduced operational coupling, supporting human-centric and resilient data engineering aligned with the conceptual goals of Industry 5.0, particularly in terms of transparency and human-centric interaction.
Modern AI platforms increasingly combine infrastructure stacks and operating models designed around different assumptions, including cloud-style service platforms, HPC workload-management systems, cloud-native orchestration, data and artifact systems, managed connectivity, observability, and edge or cyber-physical envi...
Enterprise data pipelines have grown in scale and interdependency faster than the operational practices used to maintain them. Pipeline failures are still predominantly diagnosed and remediated by human engineers reading logs, tracing lineage, and applying tacit knowledge, which produces long mean-time-to-recovery and...
A. Kolla, Ameya Kokate· International Journal of Fro...· 0 citations
Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents increasingly face reliability, context consumption, and execution stability bottlenecks when deployed on complex, long-horizon tasks. While monolithic prompt engineering and stateless tool-calling paradigms struggle to scale, the field is rapidly converging toward \emph{agen...
Sanket Badhe, D. Shah, Priyanka Tiwari et al.· 0 citations
A runtime-independent architecture that separates a continuity-bearing substrate $P_t=(I_t,M_t,B_t)$ from replaceable execution and interaction bindings is presented, which support mechanical continuity for the tested deployments and bounded workflows.
Zhe Zhao, Roy Zhao Independent Researcher, P. G. A. S. O. C. ScienceEngineering et al.· 2 citations· ⚡1
This demo presents SAGE as a pipeline-native runtime system and demonstrates it through an OPC-facing control plane and includes a compact distributed comparison against a LangChain RPC baseline over a shared 15-workload RAG suite, where SAGE nearly doubles full-RAG throughput under matched 8-node settings.
Jun Liu, Shu-Hao Zhang· Workshop Proceedings of the...· 0 citations
Digital engineering (DE) and model-based systems engineering (MBSE) improve traceability for requirements, architecture, and verification, but concept decisions—the governance events that turn evolving evidence into binding commitments—are poorly captured. Rationale, assumptions, alternatives, model baselines, and appr...
R. Chinnam, A. Murat, Satyendra Rana et al.· SAE technical paper series· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.