The results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of agent-based orchestration for enabling adaptive, validated, and interpretable multimodal imaging workflows while providing a scalable foundation for complex multi-step clinical analysis.
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence have significantly improved performance in medical imaging tasks such as segmentation, quantification, and report generation. However, most existing solutions operate as static pipelines with limited adaptability, quality assurance, and workflow-level reasoning. In this work, we present ARGUS, an agentic framework for multimodal medical image analysis that coordinates specialized agents within a unified architecture. An Orchestrator Agent interprets user requests, identifies the imaging modality, and assembles task-specific execution plans by selectively engaging processing, quantification, verification, knowledge retrieval, and reporting agents. This enables context-aware decision-making and dynamic workflow reconfiguration based on intermediate findings and runtime conditions. A key feature of ARGUS is its ability to supervise and contextualize analytical processes. The Verification Agent performs quality control by assessing intermediate artifacts against task-specific criteria, while the Knowledge Retrieval Agent enriches quantitative findings with evidence from the biomedical literature and established physiological reference ranges. Together, these components promote transparency, support automated error detection, and reduce the risk of propagating unreliable information through downstream stages. The framework was evaluated across three imaging domains: radiology (MRI), pathology (hematopathology), and ophthalmology (OCT). Quantitative evaluation demonstrated strong agreement between ARGUS and reference standards across pathology, OCT, and MRI tasks, achieving a cell-counting bias of −0.182 cells (MAE = 0.727), a full retinal thickness bias of −31.30μm (MAE = 37.63 μm), and MRI volumetric errors below 3 mL, while also achieving closer agreement with reference measurements than the evaluated general-purpose and domain-specific baseline systems. These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of agent-based orchestration for enabling adaptive, validated, and interpretable multimodal imaging workflows while providing a scalable foundation for complex multi-step clinical analysis.
Agentic AI, including multi-agent architectures, could reshape how radiology departments operate, but the field needs prospective, multi-center trials with standardized endpoints before claiming it already has.
Wei Yi, Ya-Juan Chen, Xiao Feng et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs, indicating that concept-grounded reasoning better aligns generation with clinical decision processes.
Xin-Yue Xu, Hong-Bin Lin, Juan-Gui Xu et al.· 0 citations
MedVA is presented, an end-to-end neuro-symbolic agentic system for medical volume visualization that addresses limitations through three complementary agents and provides more complete, clinically grounded ROI specifications than MLLM-only reasoning.
Haill An, Suhyeon Kim, Min-Jun Kang et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes MRER (multi-agent reasoning with evidence retrieval), a multi-agent retrieval and reasoning framework inspired by evidence-based medicine that achieves an average accuracy and improves the logical coherence and trustworthiness of the generated reasoning.
This work presents a modular medical imaging agent for binary spatial relation verification in axial CT slices using explicit modular spatial verification stages, and suggests that explicit modular spatial verification can serve as a promising building block for future report-oriented medical imaging agents.
S. Abel, Heiko Hillenhagen, Michael Götz et al.· 0 citations
Medical imaging serves as a critical source of evidence for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. However, most existing medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) systems still operate on predefined tasks and inputs, limiting their ability to address the evolving needs of clinical practice and research. AI age...
Rui Yao· Chinese journal of cancer re...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.