Skip to content

Multi-Head Latent Control: A Unified Interface for LLM Agent Decision Making

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.14277 · 0 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Multi-Head Latent Control is introduced, a lightweight layer that reads hidden-state trajectories from a frozen LLM or VLM to produce deployment-time control signals, enabling early handoff from partial generations and more accurate intervention decisions in multi-model systems.

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents, but reliable agentic behavior requires more than next-token prediction. At inference time, it is preferred that an agent can decide whether to proceed with its current reasoning, defer to a stronger model, request additional information, invoke external tools, or abstain under the given setup. Existing approaches address these decisions through prompt-level routing, external orchestration, or task-specific fine-tuning, which primarily rely on input-side signals, and are often costly and difficult to maintain as model backbones evolve. We ask whether such control decisions can be inferred directly from a model's latent generation process. We introduce Multi-Head Latent Control, a lightweight layer that reads hidden-state trajectories from a frozen LLM or VLM to produce deployment-time control signals. A Capability Head predicts whether the current model can solve the instance or should defer to a stronger collaborator, while a Resolution Head predicts appropriate resolution decision Clarification, Tool Use, Abstention, or Direct Answering. Both heads are trained only on latent traces from the same frozen LLM backbone, enabling post hoc adaptation without modifying the model. Across language and vision-language settings, Multi-Head Latent Control consistently improves the quality-cost tradeoff of multi-model systems, enabling early handoff from partial generations and more accurate intervention decisions. In routed execution (small + large model), it reduces large-model usage by up to 90.7 percent on AndroidWorld and 27-53 percent on average across benchmarks, while retaining most of large-model performance. Additionally, the learned control signals improve tool-use decision quality, yielding up to +158 percent relative score gain and 65.5 percent fewer missed-required tool calls.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Jul 2026

Personalizing Large Language Model Agents with Small Policy Models

This work forms personalization of a frozen agent as online learning of a per-user execution policy from scalar feedback observed only for the executed action, and proposes FABLE (Factorized Adaptive Bandit Layer for Execution), a lightweight policy layer outside a potentially black-box host agent.

Dian Jin, Zhi Zhang, Huichao Li et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations

This paper investigates whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups, and introduces two complementary methods: Latent Trajectory Dynamics (LTD) and the Action Representation Probe (ARP), which predicts success from representations formed at act...

Priyanka Mary Mammen, Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

This work conceptualize Agent-Centric Interactive World Proxies, shifting the fundamental paradigm from physical state transitions to agent-usable information transitions, such as execution outcomes, retrieved experiences or skills, and verification signals, broadening the scope of world modeling to provide versatile f...

Yu Yang, Xuemeng Yang, Licheng Wen et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Sampling via Decision-Flow: Training-Free Extraction of Improved Latent Reasoning Paths in Large Language Models

Decision-Flow Sampling (DF-Sample), a training-free, data-free inference-time framework that constructs a hierarchical reasoning tree, scores terminal nodes for quality, and back-propagates utilities to inform each intermediate branching decision, indicating substantial latent reasoning potential in pretrained base mod...

Zhen-Dong Mi, Shao-Yi Huang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

IAPO: Influence-Aware Policy Optimization for Credit Assignment in Multi-Turn Service Agents

Influence-Aware Policy Optimization (IAPO), which represents each rollout as a typed influence-dependency graph over trainable agent actions, with user and tool observations serving as evidence, is introduced and advances the understanding of credit assignment in multi-turn user interactions.

B. Ren, Yirong Mao, Yi Yang et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

TAPO: Transition-Aware Policy Optimization for LLM Agents

This work proposes TAPO: Transition-Aware Policy Optimization for LLM Agents, a unified training framework that alternates between policy optimization and transition supervision, and demonstrates that TAPO consistently improves task performance over pure policy optimization baselines.

Cong Li, Pei-Xi Peng, Yisen Zhao et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.