Probing cross-lingual differences in how LLMs represent Natural Language Inference

Similarity All The Way Up: Multilingual Generalization in LLMs Relies on Language-Level Similarity Structures

As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow more capable across diverse tasks, their (in)ability to generalize remains difficult to quantify and poorly understood beyond limited domains. In particular, LLMs are known to struggle generalizing multilingually, to languages outside of English, and that are poorly attested in their training data. To understand why this may be, and what enables some models to perform better than others, we turn to a long history of work across the cognitive sciences, arguing that successful generalization derives from appropriate representations in similarity space. We look at how well LLMs'representations capture the hierarchical similarity structure between distinct languages. Strikingly, we show LLMs'latent representations largely recover the hierarchical structure of the Indo-European language family tree -- grouping languages that are members of the same subfamily closely together in representation space. Furthermore, we show that the degree to which models reflect the similarity structure of languages correlates with their performance on XNLI, a multilingual natural language inference benchmark. This extends classic work on similarity-driven generalization at scale, showing how models that represent similar languages similarly generalize better from one language to another.

LLM performance on multi-interlocutor NLI tasks

Predicting Multilingual Classification and Translation Performance of LLMs with Cross-Lingual Alignment -- Is English Enough?

A PMI-based translation metric is proposed, which is less dependent on the target language and correlates strongly with chrF, and finds that CLA with English predicts translation quality comparably to or better than source-target CLA.

Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable multilingual fluency, their internal knowledge representations remain disproportionately biased toward high-resource languages. This leads to cross-lingual factual inconsistency, where they shift their empirical answer distributions based solely on the prompt language. We investigate whether these biases can be mitigated at inference time, forcing an English-prompted model to answer as if it were queried in target languages (German, Spanish, Bulgarian), and evaluate four intervention strategies: zero-shot contextual steering (persona prompting), internal representation manipulation via Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), and lightweight weight modification via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) trained on benchmark-derived factual data as well as conceptual generalization data. To assess alignment, we curate a multilingual factual dataset alongside a novel generalization benchmark comprising culturally rooted queries to determine whether factual interventions transfer to broader target-centric preferences. Experiments on Gemma 3 12B Instruct reveal persona prompting to be the strongest overall intervention, balancing efficacy, safety, and out-of-domain generalization. While CAA yields sharp inconsistency benchmark shifts, it is configuration-sensitive and risks knowledge degradation. DPO-based adapters offer permanent, yet narrower and less transferable gains. These findings suggest that cross-lingual inconsistency is at least partly a selection problem, and that simple contextual interventions may outperform more invasive methods for robust, transferable alignment.

Reversing Arrows in Large Language Models

This work presents the first systematic study of inverse relation directionality in LLMs, using a benchmark consisting of 5,457 instances spanning 27 distinct inverse relation labels and reveals systematic asymmetries in inverse relation classification across LLMs.

Mapping Written Words to Spoken Words in a Different Language Using Only Visual Grounding

In many low-resource settings, even just eliciting speech for data collection is difficult. One promising approach has been to ask speakers to describe images. But how do we build models from such visually grounded speech data? Given a dataset of images with Hindi spoken captions, we consider how we can map a written English keyword to spoken realisations of that word in Hindi. Previous work trained end-to-end multimodal neural models. Instead, we explore a simpler alignment-based approach built on self-supervised speech representations. Written English tags are automatically obtained from images using off-the-shelf image captioning systems. Hindi utterances associated with the same keyword are then aligned (using self-supervised features), and alignment evidence is aggregated to identify recurring speech segments corresponding to the target word. Experiments evaluating keyword spotting and localization show that our alignment-based approach outperforms a previous attention-based neural model. We also show the benefit of incorporating negative examples during alignment. Our work demonstrates that cross-lingual word-to-speech mappings can be learned directly from visual grounding without transcriptions or explicit model training.