This work proposes a multi-layer approach for the automated formalization and execution of partial generative specifications derived from high-level descriptions that establishes a unified pathway from partial generative artifacts to formally validated and executable models.
Abstract
System models and artifacts continuously require validation and refinement to address imprecise specifications and early-stage requirements in order to derive executable simulations. We propose a multi-layer approach for the automated formalization and execution of partial generative specifications derived from high-level descriptions. The first layer processes model seeds—potentially produced by large language models—that capture coarse structural information such as node relations, ordering, and timing estimates. Rather than requiring fully specified executable models from generative sources, we restrict their role to producing partial specifications, which are then completed through formal synthesis. We implement a synthesis engine based on Boolean satisfiability that constructs executable control flow structures from these partial specifications while enforcing structural consistency and execution semantics. Satisfiability modulo theories are further used to verify temporal properties and establish simulation baselines. The resulting models are then transformed into a set-theoretic discrete event system specification, enabling executable simulation via generated code artifacts. This pipeline establishes a unified pathway from partial generative artifacts to formally validated and executable models. It enables reliable and interpretable exploration of design alternatives and experimentation under formally grounded structural and temporal constraints, while providing a foundation for integrating generative modeling with rigorous execution semantics.
BRIDGE is presented, a structured prompting framework that decomposes verification into three interconnected domains: Code (implementations), Specifications (formal intent), and Theorem State-ments (constructive correctness claims), and elicits domain-specific intermediate reasoning to connect them.
Robert Joseph George, Carson Eisenach, Udaya Ghai et al.· 0 citations
NeuroAssertion is presented, a coverage-driven assertion generation framework that combines formal trace generation, syntax-guided synthesis (SyGuS), and an agent-inspired refinement process within a unified framework that delivers around 2X more assertions and about 2X higher mutation coverage than traditional asserti...
This approach uses LLMs to infer candidate specifications solely from test code and dynamic execution traces: the LLM observes only the program interface, selected inputs, and corresponding outputs or state changes, while the implementation internals remain hidden.
Tian-Hai Liu, Maximilian Müller, Tobias Hey et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes VPID, a multi-agent framework for generating complex Verilog that achieves monotonic functional improvement and introduces an experience-guided refinement strategy that distills historical waveform mismatches into constraints, guiding the targeted debugging for the unverified ports.
Hong-Guang Wang, Jiaming Guo, Rui Zhang et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Constraint-DEVS is introduced, a method for creating bounded Parallel DEVS models that lend themselves, in addition to simulation, to model checking and the DEVS-Suite framework's hybrid model-checking and simulation engine is extended.
This work proposes SpecLens, an automated framework for LLM-based Verilog generation that derives specification-driven constraints by analyzing behavioral divergence among multiple candidate implementations, using the original specification as the only external semantic source during generation.
Wen Bing, Bing Li· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.