By aligning EEG with layer-wise neural visibility rather than fixed high-level semantics, the proposed framework improves both retrieval accuracy and image reconstruction in EEG-based visual decoding.
Abstract
Decoding visual perception from electroencephalography (EEG) is important for non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). However, most existing visual decoding pipelines directly align EEG features with semantic features from pretrained vision models. Those EEG signals carry information at more than one level and this practice disregards the varying neural visibility of different visual components in EEG signals, leading to cross modal mismatches and incomplete information use. In this work, we address this limitation through layer-wise contrastive learning. For each subject, the intermediate CLIP layer that maximizes retrieval performance is selected as the Neural Visibility Optimal Layer (NVOL). Built on NVOL, a hierarchical framework couples retrieval and generation through a shared intermediate representation. The retrieval branch fuses multi-NVOL features, aligns them to image embeddings via contrastive learning, and applies cross-domain similarity local scaling (CSLS) at test time to mitigate hubness. The generation branch reconstructs subject-specific NVOL features from EEG using a conditional diffusion prior, maps them to CLIP space through a lightweight adapter, and drives a pretrained Stable Diffusion XL model. Experimental validation on THINGS-EEG showed that, NVOL-based retrieval achieves 78.1\% mean Top-1 accuracy in 200-way retrieval, rising to 86.4\% with CSLS. Two-stage NVOL-to-semantic reconstruction also outperforms single-stage final-layer diffusion on semantic and structural metrics. By aligning EEG with layer-wise neural visibility rather than fixed high-level semantics, the proposed framework improves both retrieval accuracy and image reconstruction in EEG-based visual decoding.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.
Computer scientist, entrepreneur, and philanthropist will collaborate with the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing to advance AI and scientific discovery.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.