Skip to content

Semantics for Description Logics via Assumption-Based Argumentation: Preliminary Results

· 0 citations · 27 references

TL;DR

This paper explores how reasoning over DL terminologies can be captured in argumentative terms, by establishing a translation into Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA), a rule-based formalism comprising defeasible assumptions, where argumentation semantics are used to retrieve sets of jointly acceptable assumptions.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access Sep 2026

When Incompleteness Does Not Matter: The Case of Incomplete Abstract Argumentation Framework (Under the Possible Perspective)

Incomplete Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (iAAFs) extend Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AAFs) by allowing arguments and attacks to be specified as uncertain, enabling a compact representation of alternative argumentation scenarios. Despite extensive work on reasoning with iAAFs, their expressive power relative...

Bettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca, F. Furfaro · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Rewrite Once, Validate Anywhere: Producing OWL-Aware SHACL Constraints (Extended Version)

This work constructs a rewriting which takes as input both shapes and an OWL EL$^-$ ontology -- a fragment of OWL EL restricting the usage of existential restrictions -- and produces SHACL constraints, providing a powerful tool which simplifies combining reasoning with validation.

Anouk Oudshoorn, Piotr Gorczyca, D. Arndt · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Syntactic Simplification of OWL Class Expressions

This paper proposes Class Expression Simplifier (CES), a novel algorithm for the syntactic simplification of class expressions in Description Logics (DL), which aims to preserve formal semantics while reducing representational complexity.

Alkid Baci, N'Dah Jean Kouagou, Caglar Demir et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.