The role of commonsense reasoning in LLMs is discussed, how they strive to emulate human-like reasoning, and why they often struggle to capture the nuanced inferences associated with commonsense understanding of the physical and social world.
Abstract
Commonsense reasoning plays a crucial role in natural language processing (NLP) by enabling systems to determine causation and assess the plausibility of various scenarios. Despite significant research focused on formalizing commonsense knowledge and integrating it with mathematical logic, replicating such reasoning in artificial intelligence systems—such as large language models (LLMs)—remains a formidable challenge. Despite these challenges, LLMs demonstrate significant promise and exhibit ongoing progress in reasoning capabilities. This article surveys the current state of commonsense reasoning in LLMs, including datasets, models, benchmarks, enhancements, opportunities, and challenges—highlighting both advancements and limitations. We discuss the role of commonsense reasoning in LLMs, how they strive to emulate human-like reasoning, and why they often struggle to capture the nuanced inferences associated with commonsense understanding of the physical and social world. This survey emphasizes the need for continued investigation and optimization, including the integration of mechanisms to enhance the reliability of these models. Overall, while LLMs are making strides in commonsense reasoning, overcoming their limitations requires further research and development to fully harness their potential.
It is argued that emergent reasoning in LLMs is a product of three factors: model size, prompting approach, and evaluation metric, and proposed implications for designing benchmarks and assessing capabilities are proposed.
N. Kuotsu· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
It is shown the path to generalizing L2 reasoning to held-out languages goes through broader language coverage, readily available multilingual non-reasoning data, and a sufficient English reasoning backbone, indicating that reasoning is a language-agnostic behavior that can be transferred across typologically diverse l...
Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Ananya Sahu, Alejandro R. Salamanca et al.· 0 citations
It is proposed that LLMs can serve not only as benchmarks for human-model alignment, but also as tools for investigating the nature of pragmatic phenomena and their relationship to linguistic theory.
A. Lombardi, Alessandro Lenci· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This paper reviews several methods aimed at improving reasoning in large language models, including prompt-based approaches, including Chain-of-Thought, self-consistency, and Auto- CoT, which try to guide models to generate intermediate reasoning steps.
DeReLab is introduced, a generative framework that produces multi-turn belief-updating conversations from parameterized graph structures across default and inheritance reasoning, with formally verified ground truth at every turn, enabling controlled measurement of how models respond to confirming and disconfirming evid...
Jayanta Sadhu, S. Shahad, Kenneth Marino· 1 citation
It is argued that epistemic diversity is a useful evaluation dimension for settings where LLMs are used to support knowledge-intensive tasks, and a preliminary framework for conceptualizing and measuring epistemic diversity in LLMs is proposed, and operationalized in two domains.
Elisabeth Kirsten, N. Krämer, Muhammad Bilal Zafar· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.