Skip to content
Preprint

Inject, Align, Recover: Staged Post-Training for Retrieval-Free Document Knowledge Internalization

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 23 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes IAR (Inject, Align, and Recover), a three-stage post-training framework that separates structured document knowledge injection, QA behavior alignment, and general ability recovery and improves the domain-primary domain-general frontier for retrieval-free document internalization.

Abstract

Large language models often fail to answer questions about a bounded document collection when the source documents are not retrieved at inference time. We study this setting as document knowledge internalization: converting a fixed corpus into usable parametric knowledge for retrieval-free question answering. We propose IAR (Inject, Align, and Recover), a three-stage post-training framework that separates structured document knowledge injection, QA behavior alignment, and general ability recovery. Unlike conventional continued pretraining, Inject converts source documents into continuation, rewrite, and instruction-conditioned reconstruction objectives. Align then adapts the injected model with answer-only QA supervision, while Recover merges the domain-adapted model with the base instruction model to recover general capabilities. Across Common Corpus (CC) and CCI, and across Llama, Phi, Qwen, and SmolLM model families, IAR improves the domain-primary domain-general frontier for retrieval-free document internalization. In the main comparison, IAR improves over Vanilla SFT on all four reported metrics in 7 of 8 dataset-model settings, with average gains of 3.6 percentage points in domain QA accuracy and 12.1 percentage points in mean general performance across IFEval, MMLU, and MSBench. Extended CC baselines show that LoRA and FAPM can win individual general metrics, but among methods that also reach leading or near-leading domain internalization, IAR retains one of the strongest general profiles.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Training a Knowledge Base: Supervised Structure Learning for Agent-Curated Document Stores

This work evaluates the curated store with a test set, on two contamination-free benchmarks: KBGym, a fictional-universe generator the authors release, and PhantomWiki, a fictional-universe generator they release, and PhantomWiki, a fictional-universe generator they release.

Yu Pan, Hongfeng Yu · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Cross-Lingual Indirect Prompt Injection Across Retrieval, Reranking, And Generation In Multilingual RAG

The results indicate that multilingual RAG security depends on several linked stages rather than generation alone, and indicates that multilingual RAG security depends on several linked stages rather than generation alone.

Fauzi Bondan Prihananto, Erlangga Bayu Yudho Prakoso, Aprilisa Arum Sari et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Open access Aug 2026

Retrieval Granularity as Evidence Design in Small-Model RAG Question Answering: A Diagnostic HotpotQA Study

Results align with a diagnostic perspective on chunking: using evidence at a task-appropriate level of granularity can improve grounding, auditability, and answer quality, but the observed patterns should be interpreted within the HotpotQA distractor setting, fixed generator, and tested context budgets.

Wei-Mao Ke, Li-Xia Yang, Meng-Yang Xu · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Intrinsic Sequence-Likelihood Confidence in Retrieval-Dominated Extractive QA: Two Pre-Specified Negatives, and What They Do and Do Not Attribute

In extractive document question answering whose questions were generated from the passages that contain their answers -- so that retrieval recovers 92-99.8% of what any mode combination could reach, whatever its absolute accuracy -- confidence-driven mechanisms have little to gain. Fine-tuning an open language model on...

Gun-Woo Lee, Chang-Min Sung, Sang-Hwan Gwak et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Knowledge Acquisition During Pre-training? Large Language Models Learn Better With Auxiliary Views

Gaps remain in our understanding of how large language models (LLMs) acquire knowledge during pre-training. We posit that auxiliary views, reformulations of knowledge, are causally helpful for learning. We design controlled experiments to isolate this. First, we confirm that repetition is necessary for acquisition and...

Joseph Lee, Yi-Di Huang, Dokyoon Kim et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Lit3R: Retrieve-Relate-Read for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering over Scientific Literature

We describe tus-nlp's Lit3R (Retrieve-Relate-Read) system for LitTraceQA, a shared task for literature-grounded question answering that requires systems to retrieve relevant papers, identify supporting evidence, and generate answers. Lit3R combines off-the-shelf retrieval, reranking, and large language model (LLM) comp...

Akira Ise, Kotaro Kumagai, Yuta Yamaguchi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.