A formal mechanism design model for the continuous participatory governance of a deployed AI agent built on the principle that governance should control an AI agent through resource allocation so as to make authorization self enforcing via compute budgets to establish the Safe AI paradigm that compute is an effective governance lever.
Abstract
We give a formal mechanism design model for the continuous participatory governance of a deployed AI agent. The mechanism is built on the principle that governance should control an AI agent through resource allocation so as to make authorization self enforcing via compute budgets. The mechanism seeks to establish the Safe AI paradigm that compute is an effective governance lever. We situate our work as a compliance or commons overlay on a deployer. One governance period is an extensive form game in which verified human stakeholders arrive sequentially and contribute, on a provision or a rejection market, in a governance currency that is deliberately distinct from the agents compute. A funding aggregator turns raw contributions into breadth weighted effective supports - a two threshold gate with hysteresis converts net support into a binary authorization that, through a coupling map bounded by an exogenously certified safety ceiling, releases a metered compute budget - realized in hardware as a signed compute license so that the decision is self-enforcing. We characterize the class of agents the mechanism can govern and isolate manipulation of the governing electorate by the governed agent as the central open problem. We also introduce several challenges addressing manipulation of governing electorate by the governed agents.
LATTICE (Layered Agentic Triad Topology for Intelligent Coordinated Execution), a governance-first architecture that reframes the authorization question from “do the authors trust this AI?” to “do they trust this architecture?”
Elias Calboreanu· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 2 citations
This work proposes ARIA as a finance-specific reference architecture and falsifiable research agenda for agent-population governance and organizes six capabilities across normative-accountability, execution-control, and assurance-learning planes: policy specification, population-level observed-versus-expected behavior...
José Manuel de la Chica Rodríguez, Juan Manuel Vera D'Iaz, Pablo Delgado Romero· 0 citations
This work develops a multilevel governance theory for agentic AI and test its mechanisms in three studies over nine model versions, from a three-billion-parameter local model to a commercial frontier system.
Production AI systems typically apply governance—compliance checking, auditing, and explanation—as an external control layer that observes outputs after they are produced. In this paper, embedded governance is proposed: a governance gate that forms part of the system architecture itself, positioned between inference an...
Waleed A. Al Shehri· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
This Perspective introduces the democratic authorization gap, defined as a break or attenuation in the demonstrable chain connecting legally and democratically grounded public authority to actions selected, sequenced, or executed by an AI agent.
Mohammed Salah, Fadi Abdelfattah, Aisha Al Araimi et al.· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 0 citations
The GAMPO framework is synthesized from a document-based qualitative evidence synthesis of 321 sources, integrating agency, agile, platform, and governance theory into a runnable specification, and capability-gated evidence that governance should be sized to spare capacity is found.
M. Johnson, Linda Naimi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.