Jul 2026· The Korea Association of Yeolin Education· Vol 34, pp. 355-387· 0 citations
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a self-perception-based scale, the Assessment of Engineering Literacy for All Majors (AELAM), applicable to Korean university students across all disciplines, and to examine the initial psychometric evidence for its internal structure. Based on a literature review and theoretical integration, a five-factor, 28-item pool was constructed and refined to 26 items through two rounds of expert content validity review (N = 14; N = 8), cognitive interviews (N = 15), and a pilot analysis (N = 248). The main survey collected data from 500 university students via the Macromill Embrain online panel. Following an analysis plan preregistered on the Open Science Framework, parallel analysis, competing confirmatory factor analyses of one- to five-factor models, and reliability and validity tests were conducted. Parallel analysis recommended a single factor, and the five-factor model was statistically equivalent to the three-factor model. Through by the principle of parsimony, a three-factor structure (engineering thinking and performance, sociotechnical responsibility and practice, sociocultural critical analysis) was adopted. A supplementary bifactor analysis yielded an explained common variance of .853 and a general-factor reliability (omega hierarchical) of .917, indicating that the scale is essentially unidimensional. Accordingly, the total score serves as the primary unit of interpretation, with the three factors functioning as auxiliary content domains for curricular feedback. The scale is designed as a learner-centered diagnostic tool that allows students to assess their own engineering-literacy self-perception and supports individualized feedback in liberal education. This study contributes a psychometric basis for redefining engineering literacy as a liberal-education competency required of all citizens and for diagnosing students' self-perception of it.
This study aimed to develop a science-literacy-based four-tier diagnostic instrument for identifying students’ misconceptions in chemical bonding and to establish evidence of its content validity. The instrument was developed using the Test Design and Development approach, focusing on the planning and development stage...
The aim of this research is to develop a valid and reliable scale to measure the self-efficacy perceptions of universitystudents in their career development processes. In the scale development process, a comprehensive literature reviewwas conducted, a pool of 16 items was created in line with the theoretical framework,...
Berna Ercan, H. Bek· HAYEF Journal of Education· 0 citations
Introduction. In contemporary Russian education, the lack of reliable and valid tools for assessing school adaptation is becoming critically evident. Existing methods either have not undergone comprehensive psychometric validation or been developed within different cultural and educational contexts. The aim of this stu...
M. Gavrilova, N. Rudnova, E. Chichinina et al.· Integraciâ Obrazovaniâ· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Medical education requires assessment of students’ capabilities across digital technologies, health data, and artificial intelligence (AI). Existing instruments address related constructs but differ in their measurement scope. This study aimed to develop and initially evaluate the Digital-Intelli...
Yan-Na Mao, Bao-Ying Chen, Min Liu· International Medical Educat...· 0 citations
This study aimed to develop and validate a short-form instrument for assessing students’ learning independence in chemistry education among senior high school students using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). A quantitative survey was conducted involving 131 twelfth-grade science...
F. Syuhada, E. Rohaeti, H. Sutrisno et al.· AMPLITUDO : Journal of Scien...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.